OPEN LETTER: Call to Suspend Aberdeen’s Voluntary Agreement Process Pending Scottish Parliament Action

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Watch the historic moment as the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee officially backs the UK RAAC Campaign Group’s petition—a groundbreaking step in our fight for justice and accountability! (here)

Below is the official text of the open letter sent to Aberdeen City Council, requesting the suspension of the current Voluntary Agreement process:

Mr Stephen Booth Corporate Landlord and all Elected Members

Aberdeen City Council
Marischal College
Broad Street
Aberdeen
AB10 1AB

Open Letter to Stephen Booth, Corporate Landlord, and All Elected Members

This letter has been sent by email. Please reply in kind.

Dear Mr. Booth and Elected Members,

RE: RAAC Remediation in Torry: A Call for Responsible Action from Aberdeen City Council

I write to you amidst significant distress caused by Aberdeen City Council’s questionable and deeply troubling decisions regarding the Balnagask Estate in Torry. These actions have created undue anxiety and fear within our community.

Despite numerous attempts by my daughter Hannah and me to highlight the plight of homeowners trapped in negative equity due to RAAC-affected roofs—defects originating from council-built properties sold under the Right-to-Buy scheme—the Council is pressing ahead with a voluntary agreement process that has been overwhelmingly rejected by residents. Homeowners have made it clear they will not engage unless offers reflect pre-RAAC-declaration valuations, which would be a fair and just baseline given the history of these properties.

On 13th November, the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee reviewed our RAAC petition and responded with decisive and supportive actions:

Next Steps and Actions:

1. Petition Status: MSP David Torrance proposed keeping the petition open to gather more information and pursue further actions.

2. Consulting Experts: The committee will seek input from Built Environment Forum Scotland, RICS, the Chartered Institution of Building, and the Royal Incorporation of Architects of Scotland regarding the petition's concerns.

3. Engagement with Housing Minister: The committee will highlight that current local authority schemes primarily offer advice, not financial support, which is a concern for affected homeowners.

4. UK Government Funding: Updates will be requested on discussions with the UK Government about funding for RAAC remediation, including potential use of UK Budget allocations by the Scottish Government.

5. Home Report Standards: The committee will ask the Housing Minister about plans to update home reports to include essential structural details for future buyers.

6. Evidence Gathering: MSP Jackson Carlaw stressed the importance of collecting evidence from stakeholders, potentially including a session with the Housing Minister.

The petition will remain open as the committee gathers evidence and engages with the Housing Minister and UK Government. A future meeting to take formal evidence from the minister is being considered to address the concerns of RAAC-impacted homeowners and explore meaningful solutions.  

You can read more and watch a video of the proceedings here: https://wilsonsthirdway.blogspot.com/2024/11/scottish-parliament-petition-committees.html

Aberdeen City Council stands alone in Scotland in pursuing a voluntary agreement process despite limited resources and ongoing public opposition. Simultaneously, you have approved a new development without secured funding, risking significant financial and reputational consequences should this escalate to a public inquiry. Residents view the Council’s actions as akin to a modern Scottish Clearance, prioritizing profit over people by replacing existing homes with developments likely to yield substantial gains for the Council.

The Balnagask Estate represents one of the UK’s most deprived communities, as evidenced by national deprivation indices. It is unacceptable for the Council to proceed without offering a fair deal to homeowners. We therefore urge you to:

1. Suspend the Voluntary Agreement Process: Await the outcomes of our petition and its associated findings before continuing with this controversial and inequitable approach.

2. Demonstrate Empathy and Leadership: Reverse the bleak narrative of bureaucratic indifference by taking meaningful, community-focused action.

Having spoken with some residents who have now initiated the voluntary agreement process and are working with Atkins Realis, they have expressed a desperate desire to continue. These residents, witnessing their community deteriorate into a ghost town plagued by increased antisocial behavior and declining hope, feel compelled to accept the meager compensation offered—simply to preserve their mental well-being. The overwhelming depression of this process has left them seeking an escape, despite the financial challenges they know they will face in the future.

However, for the majority of homeowners who remain steadfast, I reiterate the request for the council to postpone further steps in this process. Proceeding with a costly and contentious Compulsory Purchase Order at this time risks unnecessary expenditure and reputational damage. Instead, the council could await the outcome of the Scottish Parliament's Petitions Committee's favorable actions, which may offer a path toward financial reprieve for both the council and the affected homeowners.

Sincerely,

Wilson Chowdhry

Chairman

UK RAAC Campaign Group

Calls for Postponement of Controversial Voluntary Agreement as Aberdeen City Council Faces Backlash Over RAAC Crisis and Lack of Accountability

Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry present a detailed list of critical issues raised with Mr. Stephen Booth during their historic first face-to-face meeting with campaigners and Aberdeen City Council leaders.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Watch the historic moment as the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee officially backs the UK RAAC Campaign Group’s petition—a groundbreaking step in our fight for justice and accountability! (here)

Residents of Balnagask Estate in Torry remain deeply frustrated with Aberdeen City Council's handling of homes affected by Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC). Homeowners have overwhelmingly rejected the Council’s voluntary agreement process, criticizing it as unfair and dismissive of their concerns.

In an open letter addressed to all councillors and Mr. Stephen Booth, Strategic Officer - Corporate Landlord, Wilson Chowdhry urged the Council to suspend the voluntary agreement process until the Scottish Parliament’s Petition Committee completes its investigations. Read the full letter (here)

Wilson Chowdhry, an advocate for affected homeowners, has repeatedly sought essential information from the Council to explore alternative solutions. Despite multiple follow-up emails to Stephen Booth and all councillors, requests for clarity and data remain unanswered.

In a further email to Mr. Booth and councillors, Mr. Chowdhry wrote:

"I’m following up as I have still not received the breakdown of property types in relation to the number of owners promised over 2 months ago, specifically the number of private homeowners for 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, and 4-bedroom properties. Additionally, I am still awaiting details regarding any blocks of homes where no council tenants reside. This information is crucial for me to explore potential opportunities for self-funding and to raise the issue of improved terms under the Scheme of Assistance Strategy."

The delay in providing such critical information underscores what Mr. Chowdhry describes as a profound lack of transparency and urgency from the Council. He remarked, “This data is vital for exploring alternative solutions and advocating for fair terms for homeowners. The lack of responsiveness further alienates a community already struggling with the Council’s misguided actions.”

Mr. Chowdhry also highlighted that Mr. Booth appears to be exploiting a misunderstanding within the Torry Community RAAC Campaign Group, whose leaders have inadvertently advised residents that certain offers are no longer available. He emphasized, “This misunderstanding is not their fault but rather a consequence of the Council’s convoluted and overly complex language, which often leaves less experienced individuals struggling to grasp key details.”

This obfuscation, intentional or not, has only served to deepen the mistrust between the Council and the affected community, making it even harder to reach fair and equitable solutions.

Additionally, Mr. Chowdhry's questions, sent on 1st November, remain unanswered, despite several subsequent communications with Mr. Booth. This delay raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability from Aberdeen City Council.

He specifically asked for the Council’s rationale for denying responsibility for RAAC in properties it constructed and sold to private homeowners without disclosure. This omission is compounded by the Council’s approach to deducting roof repair costs from property valuations, which homeowners consider unjust.

The statement that "the Council has ruled out the viability of roof replacement for our own stock, and there is no approved funding route to private owners" adds further confusion. Mr. Chowdhry questioned whether this aligns with the Council’s legal obligations under Section 71 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006, which addresses responsibilities for housing defects.

Concerns were also raised about the 2003 Local Government Act’s “best value” requirement. Mr. Chowdhry argued that the Council’s approach—focusing solely on financial cost—fails to account for fairness, socio-economic impacts, and the well-being of affected communities. He emphasized the Council’s legal duty under the Fairer Scotland Duty to address socio-economic inequalities, as well as its commitments to the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

The lack of public involvement in decision-making was another major concern. Mr. Chowdhry noted that withholding key details on voluntary agreements undermines residents’ ability to engage meaningfully, which breaches Section 10 of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015.

Finally, he questioned the inclusion of demolition and redevelopment proposals for Balnagask without secured construction funding, drawing parallels to the 2010 rejection of West Lothian Council’s Compulsory Purchase Order. Mr. Chowdhry warned that a similar lack of planning could lead to legal and reputational challenges for Aberdeen City Council.

Residents are demanding clear and detailed responses to these pressing issues, along with assurances of fair treatment and adherence to legal obligations.

Scottish Parliament Steps In

On 13th November, the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee reviewed a petition submitted by Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry and responded with robust support. The Committee initiated actions to address the systemic challenges faced by RAAC-affected homeowners, including:

• Engaging industry experts to conduct comprehensive assessments of RAAC risks and recommend effective solutions.
• Collaborating with the Housing Minister to potentially overhaul inadequate local authority assistance schemes that currently exclude funding for essential remedial works.
• Advocating for UK Government funding for RAAC remediation or seeking clarity on whether the Scottish Government will allocate part of the recently confirmed £3.4 billion budget from the UK Chancellor to address the issue.
• Reviewing and updating home report standards to ensure greater transparency for prospective homeowners, alongside considering legislative reforms proposed by Mr. Chowdhry.
• Formally collecting evidence from key stakeholders, with plans to potentially hear directly from the Housing Minister, underscoring the gravity of the issue and the need for immediate action.

The petition remains open, with continued evidence gathering to secure meaningful solutions.

A Call for Action

Aberdeen City Council has faced criticism for continuing with the voluntary agreement process despite widespread opposition and without providing the necessary resources or support to homeowners. Residents view the process as inequitable, with offers falling far short of pre-RAAC-declaration valuations—terms deemed fair by the community.

Mr. Chowdhry also criticized the Council for prioritizing a redevelopment project, despite lacking secured funding. He stated, “The Council’s approach appears to prioritize profit over people. The voluntary agreement process is nothing short of a modern Scottish Clearance, displacing vulnerable residents to pave the way for new developments.”

Next Steps

Mr. Chowdhry and his daughter have requested to speak at the next Council meeting addressing RAAC-related issues, urging the Council to suspend the voluntary agreement process until the outcomes of the Scottish Parliament’s investigation are known.

He concluded, “The actions of Aberdeen City Council have been callous and without empathy. It’s time for them to reflect and take meaningful steps to rebuild trust with the Balnagask community.”

The residents of Balnagask Estate remain united in their demand for fairness and accountability, warning that without just terms, they will resist redevelopment efforts.

Scottish Parliament Petition Committee's Review of Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry’s RAAC Petition: Key Outcomes and Next Steps

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

On 13th November, the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee reviewed the UK RAAC Campaign Group petition, authored by Wilson Chowdhry and his daughter, Hannah Chowdhry. Here, we outline the key outcomes and next steps.

The outcome of the Scottish Government committee's consideration of the RAAC petition is largely supportive, with several actions agreed upon to address the concerns raised. Here’s a summary of the key points discussed and the steps the committee decided to take:

Scottish Government’s Response:

1. • SPICe (Scottish Parliament Information Centre - provides impartial research and analysis)  indicated that while funding specifically for RAAC-related repairs isn’t currently offered, the Scottish Government did previously have a scheme to support homeowners with structural defects and is open to discussions with the UK Government regarding RAAC funding.
   • The government stated that the presence of RAAC (Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete) in buildings doesn’t automatically mean they’re unsafe. Homeowners are advised to follow a risk-based assessment approach recommended by the Institution of Structural Engineers, as some buildings may not present immediate issues.
   • Local authorities are expected to have an “Assistance Scheme” strategy, which provides advice for homeowners needing home repairs, although it currently focuses on guidance rather than financial support.
   • There’s also mention of reviewing the Scottish home report to ensure buyers can make informed choices, possibly by including structural details and materials used, to understand future performance.

2. Next Steps and Actions:

   • Keeping the Petition Open: MSP David Torrance suggested keeping the petition open to gather more information and pursue further actions.
   • Consulting Relevant Bodies: The committee will write to professional organizations, including Built Environment Scotland, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the Chartered Institution of Building, and the Royal Incorporation of Architects of Scotland, to review and respond to the concerns raised in the petition.
   • Engagement with the Minister of Housing: The committee will highlight that the current assistance schemes by local authorities mainly provide advice rather than tangible financial support, which is a concern for affected homeowners.
   • Exploring UK Government Funding: The committee will to seek an update on discussions with the UK Government on funding for RAAC remediation and management, including whether the Scottish Government will use funding resulting from the recent UK Budget to address this issue
   • Reviewing Home Report Standards: The committee will ask the Minister for Housing about plans to update the home report, ensuring it includes essential structural information to help future buyers make informed decisions.
   • Gathering Evidence: MSP Jackson Carlaw emphasized the importance of formally gathering evidence from stakeholders, including possibly hearing directly from the Housing Minister, to thoroughly explore the issues raised in the petition.

3. Conclusion:

• The petition will remain open as the committee proceeds with evidence gathering and requests further responses from the Minister for Housing and the UK Government. This ongoing engagement aims to address the concerns of homeowners impacted by RAAC and to explore meaningful solutions. There is potential for a future meeting where the committee will take formal evidence from the minister, reflecting the issue's significance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some of the direct transcript of video:

SPICE: While the Scottish Government is not currently providing funding to local authorities or homeowners it has previously operated a scheme to support to homeowners who have recently bought a home with Inherent structural defects 

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT: In response to the petition the Scottish Government set out the presence of RAAC does not necessarily mean that the building is unsafe.  Recommend that homeowners follow the Institution of Structural Engineers risk-based approach.  As for some properties there may be no issue to address.

The Scottish Government is committed to working with UK Government on this issue and also references the requirement for local authorities to have a Scheme for Assistance strategy that sets out support available to private homeowners to make repair to their homes.

Mention is also made to review the home report which is expected to consider how to ensure buyers can make an informed decision in relation to undertaking more detailed surveys. Including structural reports that establish how the property was built, what materials were used and how these will perform in the future.

Jackson Carlaw: How might we proceed with an important petition and one that many of us have seen some documentary coverage of the issues arising from.

David Torrance: Keep the petition open and writing to Built Environment Forum Scotland, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Chartered Institution of Building, Royal Incorporation of Architects of Scotland  seeking review of the actions called of in this petition.  I wonder if the committee would also consider writing to the Minister of Housing highlight the petition submission including the concern that local authority schemes for assistance only offers advice and guidance rather than finding when repairs are required.  

Jackson Carlaw: Also seek an update and discussions with the UK Government on the funding for RAAC remediation and the management whether the Scottish Government can find any scope in relation to that.  And ask the Minister for further information on plans to review the Scottish Home report.  I also feel the issues raised in this petition merit some formal taking of evidence at some point, so I would think that the information we are seeking at this stage would help inform the committee.  But this is obviously of huge material concern to those individuals who have affected by RAAC and depending on whether or not we think the answers we receive allow the aims of the petition to advance in a meaningful way, or to be addressed by some other means.  I think we should flag up that it is very much an issue in which we might want to take up evidence with the minister at a future meeting

We will keep the petition open, we will take forward the evidence gathering that we have suggested this morning and we will also write to the Minister for Housing to seek responses to the points made by the petitioner to date together with information form the UK Government.  We will do that with a view to potentially hearing from the minister where we can explore these issue in more detail and therefore have some answers and some exploration of them  for the many people that have been affected by this issue.

(incorporating potential funding through £3.4bn treasury budget)

Dundee Homeowners Launch RAAC Justice Campaign: Petition, Protests, and Community Action

Wilson Chowdhry, Kerry Mackintosh, Wayne Hoskins and Yvette Hoskins

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

RAAC-affected homeowners in Dundee have launched a campaign for justice after being caught in a financial crisis over the purchase of ex-council homes built in the 1960s with Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) roofs. In October, we reported on the struggles of Wayne Hoskins, who received only a single letter from the council notifying him that his roof contained RAAC. The council then left him to address the issue alone. When Mr. Hoskins later attempted to sell his home, he discovered that traditional estate agents wouldn’t list it, and even after lowering the price by £30,000 for auction, he was still unable to sell due to mortgage companies refusing loans to potential buyers.

Wilson and Kerry went door-to-door, meeting with affected homeowners to hear their concerns firsthand.

Wayne Hoskins reached out to the UK RAAC Campaign Group, where Chairman Wilson Chowdhry highlighted Mr. Hoskins’ case, drawing interest from The Dundee Courier, who published an article outlining his challenges. Mr. Chowdhry has since reached out to Dundee City Council multiple times to request a deputation, but the council has not prioritized RAAC as an agenda item, effectively blocking public discussion. He also encouraged Mr. Hoskins to request that his local councillors introduce an agenda item on RAAC, but there has been no progress to date.

Meanwhile, Mr. Chowdhry advised Mr. Hoskins to create a Facebook group, "Dundee RAAC Campaign Group," which has attracted nearly 200 homeowners and tenants facing similar issues. Many of these supporters have signed a petition Mr. Chowdhry and his daughter Hannah submitted on the Scottish Parliament website, which has now surpassed 1,600 signatures.

The petition has three principal demands:

1. Establish a national fund to support homeowners and tenants affected by RAAC.
2. Initiate a public inquiry into the actions of councils and housing associations regarding RAAC.
3. Enact or update legislation to hold developers, councils, and housing associations accountable for using substandard materials, mandate full disclosure of risks, and make surveyors and solicitors liable for undiscovered defects.

The petition is set to be reviewed by the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday, November 13, and could lead to one of the following outcomes:

• A request for written information from the Scottish Government, local authorities, and relevant organizations.
• An invitation for the petitioner to share personal stories directly with the committee.
• A referral of the petition to another committee for in-depth review.
• Recommendations for the Scottish Government to establish a financial support fund for RAAC homeowners.
• A debate in the Scottish Parliament Chamber to raise awareness and build further support.

Notably, the petition has received support letters from two MSPs—a rare endorsement on the Scottish Parliament petition site. Murdo Fraser MSP (Mid Scotland and Fife) and Edward Mountain MSP (Highlands and Islands) have backed the petition, and Liam Kerr MSP is expected to discuss it during the hearing.

On Saturday, November 9, Wilson Chowdhry and Kerry Mackintosh from the UK RAAC Campaign visited Wayne and his wife Yvette to plan a protest and a community meeting. The protest is scheduled for Saturday, November 23, at City Square, outside Caird Hall, from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., followed by the first meeting of the Dundee RAAC Campaign Group at Downfield Mains Church, 39 Haldane Crescent, Dundee, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. After the meeting, Wilson and Kerry visited all local RAAC-affected properties in Mr. Hoskins' area, providing residents with updates and details about their campaign. Mr. Chowdhry has since obtained official permission from local police to hold the protest.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of UK RAAC Campaign Group, said:  

"Homeowners like Wayne Hoskins have been left abandoned, with properties they can’t sell and debts they can’t escape," said Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group. "The councils and government must take responsibility for the financial and emotional turmoil the RAAC scandal has caused. We’re determined to fight for a national fund and real accountability for everyone impacted by RAAC across Scotland."

The UK RAAC Campaign Group is also inviting supporters to join a protest outside the Scottish Parliament on 13th November 2024, from 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., and to sign their online petitions (here) and (here).

RAAC-Affected Homeowners Outraged by Councillor’s Hostile Demeanor, Fear Unfair Council Decisions

Evacuated RAAC homeowners from Tillicoultry gather in the foyer of Kilncraigs with Wilson Chowdhry of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, awaiting their meeting with Council leaders.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Tillicoultry, Clackmannanshire – Displaced residents from Tillicoultry affected by the RAAC (Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete) crisis were left disheartened and angry after a recent Clackmannanshire Council meeting (8th November) intended to update them on housing and safety options. Having faced the trauma of evacuation from structurally compromised homes, months of difficult temporary accommodation, and an uncertain future, homeowners arrived hoping for support, answers, and a demonstration of empathy from council leaders. Unfortunately, the meeting only deepened their sense of being marginalized.

Homeowners gathered before the meeting

Wilson Chowdhry expressed concerns that the removal of Wilson Lees from their role in liaising with homeowners had undermined their position. He emphasized that, as previously agreed in meetings and through electronic correspondence with Murray Sharp, Wilson Lees, and Andrew Buchanan, one of the proposals should include a valuation of homeowners' properties based on their worth prior to the RAAC declaration.Mr. Wells confirmed that a pre-RAAC declaration valuation would indeed be submitted as one proposal amongst many, alongside an assessment of the impact on the council, homeowners, and other stakeholders. He clarified that councillors would make a recommendation after carefully considering all relevant factors, stating, “We cannot pre-empt the councillors’ recommendation.”

During the meeting, Rebecca Doherty a homeowner became visibly emotional as she explained her struggles, breaking down while sharing the burden of paying both her mortgage and rent, alongside council tax for her new property. Her heartfelt plea for assistance in the form of a council tax discount left a powerful impact on those present. In response, Mr. Wells acknowledged the difficulty of her situation and advised that someone from the council would assess her case to determine what financial support could be offered. However, he clarified that due to strict regulations, a waiver for council tax was unlikely.

Seeing the broader implications for other homeowners in similar positions, Mr. Chowdhry intervened and requested that the same financial assessment be offered to all affected residents, which Mr. Wells agreed to. To facilitate this, contact details were exchanged, allowing council officers to reach out directly to homeowners for further assistance.

Mr. Chowdhry requested an opportunity for public participation at the upcoming Full Council meeting where the options report would be discussed. Councillor McTaggart replied that Clackmannanshire Council currently lacks a procedure allowing public involvement in such meetings. Aware of the council’s procedures, Mr. Chowdhry inquired whether a suspension of standing orders might allow this participation. Cllr. McTaggart acknowledged that it was possible, but noted that it could be unlikely, as it might set a precedent for future meetings.

Mr. Wells then clarified that, as per prior conversations and email exchanges with Mr. Chowdhry, he had already raised the suspension request with the Chief Executive, highlighting the urgency of allowing distressed, evacuated homeowners a platform to voice their concerns. He also confirmed his ongoing efforts to advance a third petition through the council, which, if approved, could create a pathway for public participation.

Additionally, Mr. Wells clarified that any discussion in the council chamber would focus strictly on the petition itself rather than the broader proposal. Mr. Chowdhry noted that this stance differed from previous council communications, but he agreed that the petition's wording could still lead to a meaningful dialogue.

The meeting quickly turned tense, with homeowners questioning the council’s timeline for delivering a long-promised options report and sharing concerns about the suitability and duration of their current housing arrangements. Councillor Jane McTaggert’s few comments, however, came across as dismissive, adding to residents' frustrations. “This meeting was our chance to understand what lies ahead, but Cllr McTaggert’s responses felt like a rebuff to our genuine concerns,” Lynsey Macquater said. Her remark, “We are doing everything we can?” in response to one resident’s plea for clarity on the timeline, struck many as lacking empathy and awareness of the difficult position homeowners are in.

One of the meeting’s most poignant moments occurred when Jimmy Vallance, a resident affected by the RAAC crisis, tried to describe the trauma he and his wife Fiona have faced. Emotionally overwhelmed, Jimmy broke down, unable to continue. Fiona took over, sharing their daily struggle: “Jimmy and I cannot speak. We are consumed by this from the minute we wake up every day. From our temporary home we hear every noise from upstairs, and everything of ours is still in boxes. We have been lying on a rubber mattress covered with mould.” Jimmy then interrupted, capturing the depth of their anguish, saying, “You are lucky that we are both still here,” a stark expression of the extreme emotional toll this crisis has taken on them.

A 1 hour protest took place from 11:00 - 12:00 prior to the meeting.

Instead of offering empathy, Councillor Jane McTaggert responded with a statement that left the room in silence. “You don’t know how we are feeling, do you think we are enjoying this? It’s hard on us too,” she said, a comment that homeowners felt was dismissive of their suffering. Her tone and phrasing, described as “condescending” by several attendees, often left the room in stunned silence.

At this particularly tense moment in the meeting, Kevin Wells, Strategic Director - Place, stepped in to address the residents’ concerns with a more understanding approach. “We can never fully understand what you are all going through, and I do appreciate it is a challenging time,” he acknowledged. “From our perspective, this is always at the top of our list. There are limitations to what we can do as a council. The housing officer is us reaching out. I’m sorry if that doesn’t seem like enough. We are trying to do what we can. We are more than happy to explore what we can do for you with all of you.” Wells’ response provided a brief sense of relief, but the meeting's overall tone had already left many residents feeling alienated. “We’re already in limbo. We needed empathy and understanding, but it felt like we were being scolded for asking for clarity,” shared one resident after the meeting.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK Campaign Group and an advocate for the RAAC-affected homeowners, expressed deep concern over the council’s approach. “This meeting was an opportunity for the council to demonstrate compassion and to reassure residents that their voices are being heard. Instead, residents were met with defensiveness and a lack of urgency. Cllr McTaggert’s tone throughout the meeting eroded the confidence of already beleaguered residents,” he said.

Despite everything they have endured, homeowners remain positive, finding strength in their solidarity.

However, some practical outcomes did emerge from the meeting. Residents were informed that a Full Council Meeting, set for 30th January, will include the presentation of the council’s options report for RAAC-affected homes. To ensure residents’ priorities are fully represented, Kevin Wells invited them to submit a list of specific outcomes and requests, which Mr. Chowdhry will prepare on their behalf, engaging with Mr. Wells in the coming months. Additionally, Mr. Wells is working to facilitate the approval of a residents' petition and is exploring the suspension of standing orders to allow Mr. Chowdhry to represent homeowners directly during the Full Council Meeting.

Despite these efforts, the RAAC-affected homeowners left the meeting feeling doubtful about the council’s commitment to providing an impartial, well-considered options report. Many fear that the council’s handling of the crisis may be biased, given the dismissive tone exhibited during the meeting. “We worry now that any options report delivered by this council will reflect the same lack of empathy we encountered today. If Cllr McTaggert’s approach is indicative of broader council attitudes, it’s hard to have faith in a fair outcome,” said one homeowner.

As residents prepare to attend the upcoming Full Council Meeting, they remain determined to ensure their voices are heard. “These homeowners have already endured more than enough,” continued Chowdhry. “They deserve transparency, respect, and a real plan for their futures. We will continue to stand with them, pushing for a process that is both fair and empathetic.”

This experience has only strengthened their resolve to hold Clackmannanshire Council accountable as they await the council’s options report and its decisions on their futures.

Political Momentum Grows Behind Petition by UK RAAC Campaign Group as MSPs and MPs Urge Action on RAAC-Homes Crisis

L-R Wilson Chowdhry, Wayne Hoskins and Mrs Hoskins Mr Hoskins home in Dundee.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

As the crisis of RAAC (Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete) continues to devastate homeowners across Scotland, political support for Petition PE2113—calling on the Scottish Government to take action for affected communities—has gained substantial momentum. A growing number of Scottish Parliament Members (MSPs) are joining the call for justice, urging both the Scottish Government and local authorities to step up with a comprehensive support system for homeowners facing negative equity and housing instability due to the RAAC crisis.

Several MSPs have already demonstrated their commitment to the petition, which seeks the creation of a national fund, the initiation of a public inquiry, and updated legislation to better support RAAC homeowners. This petition, unique in the level of support from MSPs, is a rare occurrence on the Scottish Parliament’s petition website. No other petition has received as many written submissions from MSPs endorsing it, significantly strengthening its case.

Murdo Fraser MSP, in his submission to the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, highlighted the urgent need for action, stating:
"I believe that the Scottish Government needs to investigate appropriate financial support for these individuals who have been left in this very unfortunate position. I strongly support the petition’s asks for a national fund and public inquiry." Fraser further emphasized the need for a public response from the Scottish Government to address the situation.

Similarly, Edward Mountain MSP, after meeting with RAAC protestors in September 2024, expressed his deep concern and support for the petition. In his written submission, he said:
"I was deeply saddened to hear some of the protestors’ personal stories; so many of them are losing their homes, and yet there is no adequate compensation scheme in place. I believe the petition’s asks are reasonable—setting up a national fund, initiating a public inquiry, and ensuring that legislation is updated." Mountain added that he was disappointed these measures had not been implemented sooner, noting the urgency of the crisis.

This level of political support, including from key MSPs like Murdo Fraser and Edward Mountain, could be pivotal in achieving a positive response from the Scottish Government. The petition committee now has a clear path forward, and there are several potential outcomes for the petition, such as:

• Requesting written information from the Scottish Government, local authorities, and other relevant organizations.
• Inviting the petitioner to speak directly to the committee to share personal stories and further insights.
• Referring the petition to another committee for detailed scrutiny.
• Recommending actions for the Scottish Government, including the establishment of a dedicated financial support fund for RAAC homeowners.
• Requesting a debate in the Scottish Parliament Chamber to raise awareness and garner further support for affected homeowners.

In an encouraging development, Liam Kerr MSP, who has shown an active interest in the petition, is confirmed to attend the petition consideration meeting. The Petition Committee clerk informed the petitioner:
"Where an MSP has noted their interest in a petition, we will notify them when the petition is scheduled for consideration, and they are welcome to attend the Committee meeting. While it remains at the Convener’s discretion whether to invite non-Committee MSPs to speak on a particular petition, MSPs will typically be invited to make a brief contribution to assist the Committee with its deliberations. We currently have Liam Kerr MSP listed as an interested MSP for your petition, and will notify him when a date for the consideration has been confirmed."

Mr. Liam Kerr urged Shona Robison to address the anger among homeowners who are boycotting a voluntary purchase scheme until the “RAAC penalty”—deducting repair costs from property values—is removed. With RAAC repair costs estimated between £40,000 and £71,000 per property, these deductions could significantly reduce payouts, potentially leaving owners in negative equity. Kerr attributed the issue to government underfunding of Aberdeen Council and questioned whether the Scottish Government would intervene. Robison acknowledged the concerns about negative equity and repair costs, expressing willingness to discuss further and consider RAAC issues in future budget planning.

Following correspondence from a constituent, Niamh Thomson from Shona Robison MSP's office expressed sympathy for Mr. Hoskins and other homeowners affected by RAAC in Dundee City Council properties. However, she clarified that the issue is predominantly legal, limiting MSP involvement. She stated, "I understand that this will be primarily a legal dispute, and I was glad to read that you have sought advice from a solicitor in this matter. Due to the legal nature of this complaint, there will be a limit on the assistance that our office can provide, as MSPs are not permitted to become involved in legal disputes." It remains unclear whether Mr. Kerr is aware of Ms. Robison’s stance, which suggests that affected homeowners pursue costly legal action rather than seeking financial support from the Scottish Government to address their RAAC crisis.

Mr. Liam Kerr has also informed Wilson Chowdhry that Audrey Nicoll MSP will be raising a portfolio question on the RAAC issue this week, as mentioned by Liam Kerr. He’s also attempting to secure an opportunity to address the issue during First Minister's Questions, though he notes that getting a question in at FMQs can be difficult.

Mr. Liam Kerr urged Shona Robison to address the anger among homeowners who are boycotting a voluntary purchase scheme until the “RAAC penalty”—deducting repair costs from property values—is removed. With RAAC repair costs estimated between £40,000 and £71,000 per property, these deductions could significantly reduce payouts, potentially leaving owners in negative equity. Kerr attributed the issue to government underfunding of Aberdeen Council and questioned whether the Scottish Government would intervene. Robison acknowledged the concerns about negative equity and repair costs, expressing willingness to discuss further and consider RAAC issues in future budget planning.

Stephen Flynn MP, leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP) in the House of Commons, recently wrote to the UK Government’s Chancellor to express his concern over the refusal to allocate funding for RAAC-affected homeowners. In his letter, Flynn stated:
"Whilst I note that £1 billion has been allocated in your Budget for RAAC hospital repairs, with an additional £1.4 billion for schools, I am extremely concerned by the omission of funding for RAAC-affected housing. It is clear the UK Government intends to continue dragging its heels on providing any support for the many people across the UK impacted by this issue."

Flynn emphasized that the RAAC crisis is a UK-wide problem that demands an immediate response from the UK Government. He continued:
"This is a UK-wide issue that must be met with a response from the UK Government, and I urge you to put in place funding for those people affected."

His statement highlights the urgent need for financial assistance for homeowners facing the devastating consequences of RAAC, and his condemnation of the UK Government’s lack of action adds to the growing pressure on both the UK and Scottish Governments to address the issue.

Local councils, however, are still struggling to find viable solutions. Aberdeen City Council, for example, proposed voluntary agreements for homeowners but excluded the substantial costs of repairs, leaving residents facing tens of thousands of pounds in losses. These proposals have been met with widespread rejection by affected homeowners. Additionally, West Lothian Council’s Julie Whitelaw expressed the council's position on the issue in a recent communication to petitioners:

"Providing financial assistance for all repair work associated with RAAC would be a significant undertaking. While we understand the challenges faced by homeowners, we must consider the broader implications of such a policy within the context of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. [...] The council’s current focus is on advice and guidance. We acknowledge that there may be instances where financial support could be beneficial, but such assistance for RAAC alone does not align with the principles of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006."

Whitelaw’s letter reflects the broader issue homeowners face in addressing the crisis, as councils focus largely on providing non-financial advice rather than direct financial support.

The ongoing support for Petition PE2113 from both Murdo Fraser MSP and Edward Mountain MSP, along with the confirmation of Liam Kerr MSP’s attendance at the petition consideration, marks a critical moment for RAAC homeowners. With strong political backing, the petition has the potential to force the Scottish Government to take immediate action—both legislatively and financially—to support the families who are suffering the consequences of RAAC. 

UK RAAC Campaign Group was to place more pressure on the Scottish Parlaiment's Petition Committe and are urging people moved by this issue to join them at a protest outside the Scottish Parliament on November 13th

Scottish Parliament Protest Organized by the UK RAAC Campaign Group

Date: Wednesday, 13th November 2024
Time: 9:30 - 10:30 am
Location: Scottish Parliament Building, Holyrood, Edinburgh, EH99

Details:
Join us as we gather outside the Scottish Parliament ahead of a crucial session at 10:50 am, where an online petition will be considered. This petition calls for the establishment of a national fund, necessary legislative reforms, and a public inquiry into the RAAC crisis impacting homeowners across Scotland.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, expressed gratitude to MPs and MSPs for their growing support in addressing the RAAC crisis and emphasized the urgency of establishing a national fund to support affected homeowners. He stated:

"I am deeply grateful to the MPs and MSPs who have shown solidarity with RAAC homeowners, standing alongside us in the call for meaningful action and financial support. The Scottish Government now has an opportunity to lead by example and do what is right for its people—by ensuring a robust national fund is put in place to support those impacted by this crisis. I encourage everyone who is affected or concerned by the RAAC situation to join us in our protest outside the Scottish Parliament on 13th November from 9:30 to 10:30 am. Together, we can amplify our message and press for the justice and support these families urgently deserve.

Emotional Re-Entry for RAAC-Evacuated Tillicoultry Homeowners as Clackmannanshire Council Coordinates Valuable Item Retrieval

An AMC removal van parked outside the evacuated Tillicoultry flats, ready to assist with the removal of residents' belongings.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Tillicoultry, Clackmannanshire, 6th November 2024 – After over one year of displacement and logistical setbacks, RAAC-affected homeowners in Tillicoultry are finally being granted one final access to their homes to retrieve essential belongings. This emotional milestone, coordinated by Clackmannanshire Council with support from Kevin Wells and Wilson Lees, follows a prolonged struggle to address the practical and psychological toll of displacement for the affected families.

The road to this re-entry process has been a complex one. Initially, homeowners had been in frequent communication with Wilson Lees, the Homelessness and Supporting People Manager, who maintained regular contact with residents over WhatsApp for a year. “Wilson was our primary connection with the council when things were at their most confusing,” said one homeowner. “His support helped us feel like someone in the council understood what we were going through.”

A liveried Clackmannanshire Council van was utilized by officers to assist with the re-entry process.

In the early stages, Wilson Lees had suggested that accompanied re-entries might be feasible. However, when a scheduled meeting on 22nd September was unexpectedly cancelled by Strategic Director of Place, Kevin Wells, homeowners were left in limbo. The sudden termination of the dedicated WhatsApp group—a crucial communication lifeline—added to the confusion, leaving many feeling abandoned by the council.

This cancellation was a major setback for families who had taken time off work, carefully prepared questions, and expected to receive structured logistical plans for re-entry along with details on overall support. “We’d rearranged our lives and cleared our schedules, hoping to get concrete answers,” said one resident. “But with the meeting suddenly off the table, it felt like we were back at square one.”

Jim Vallance pictured with Denise Hamilton, the mother of a homeowner, as they support each other while retrieving belongings on the same day.

Wilson Chowdhry Pushes for Rescheduled Access

In response, Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, pressed the council to reschedule the meeting and expedite decisions for re-entry, stressing the mounting emotional strain on homeowners. “People were desperate to collect their things and wanted a clearer understanding at where things were heading so tey could  begin rebuilding some normalcy, but these cancellations and delays made the situation feel endless,” Chowdhry said. He emphasized the urgent need to confirm the feasibility of re-entries, especially for residents still facing mortgage, rent, and utility payments on vacated properties.

After weeks of communication and advocacy, a rescheduled meeting finally took place on 20th October, where Chowdhry, and Wells, discussed logistics for the item retrieval process. The meeting, though positive, was a disappointment for residents as the council underscored the safety challenges of accessing the RAAC-affected buildings. It was ultimately decided that residents would need to view their belongings remotely, through a video link to avoid structural risks. Although residents had hoped for more direct access, they agreed, recognizing there was no other option open to them. However, they requested larger viewing screens for ease – a request that was unfortunately met with only a mobile phone link due to logistical constraints.

An AMC Removal van, prepared and ready for packing and loading.

Challenging Scheduling for Re-Entry

Scheduling re-entry dates also proved challenging, with families trying to coordinate around work and personal commitments. Homeowners like Lynsey Maquater faced particular difficulties; her original re-entry was planned for 5th November, but personal obligations required a new date, which the council was able to adjust to 31st October. These logistical hurdles added strain to what was already an emotionally charged process.

The re-entry schedule unfolded as follows:

• 30th October – 81 Chapelle Crescent
• 31st October – High Street and Park Street Residents (excluding resident of 39 High Street)
• 6th & 7th November – Resident of 39 High Street, given the extensive material requiring clearance.

Jim and Fiona squinted intently at the small phone screen, trying to make out details of their flat during the video link viewing.

Process and Challenges: The re-entry process, coordinated by Clackmannanshire Council and AMC Removals, required careful planning due to structural safety concerns. Residents were not permitted to physically enter the properties themselves; instead, they viewed the removal of items via a video link in a protective cabin. Although a larger screen was requested, residents had to make do with a mobile phone view, which further complicated an already challenging experience.

The council’s chosen contractor, AMC Removals, coordinated a detailed removal process involving multiple vehicles, staff, and council officials. Homeowners, though unable to enter their properties directly, viewed the retrieval of items from a protective cabin, monitoring the process via video feed. For some residents, the experience brought both relief and sorrow. There were also two council officers who were praised for their sensitivity and support, easing the difficult process for residents. “The staff were incredibly patient and flexible, which really helped reduce the anxiety everyone was feeling,” said Hamilton.

Jim signing an authority and liability waiver to allow the removal of his belongings to proceed.

Emotional Experiences During the Re-Entry Process:

• Denise Hamilton described a poignant moment as she sat in a small mobile cabin outside her former home. “I was okay until I sat down in the little hut and got a wee bit emotional speaking to [council officer] Kim about the situation everybody is in,” she shared. Hamilton was able to retrieve several items for her daughter Emma, including two wall heaters and a wall-mounted hall table. While grateful to see the property “in pretty good condition,” Hamilton added, “It’s just a little step forward, and there’s still a long way to go.”

• Gary Morrison struggled with the state of his property on the top floor, which had accumulated significant damage due to inspections. “There was significant damage and debris... we couldn’t take the fridge/freezer due to mould, fungus, and insects,” Morrison noted. Although his refrigerator was beyond saving, Morrison appreciated the council’s efforts: “Kim was considerate and helpful, and the contractors did all the heavy lifting to move the washing machine to my garage. On the day, the staff could not have been better.”

• Fiona Vallance and her husband, Jimmy, felt both relief and sorrow upon re-entering their property. “We felt a bit emotional seeing inside the flat,” she said. “The council and contractors were very kind and considerate. Kim was lovely, caring, and respectful while listening to us. We managed to get our radiators out, which we were pleased about.” However, the sight of the extensive damage, particularly holes in the ceiling, cast a shadow on the day. “We hope this will be finalised soon and let us continue with a normal life.”

• Frances Reid echoed similar sentiments, feeling surprised and thankful for the condition of her items. “Guys, can I just say I was pleasantly surprised with the condition of the items after being boarded up all this time,” she said. “I got my leather sofa, beds, and mattresses into a van. I told them not to lift them if they were mouldy or damp, and they were okay. It was emotional – yes, sad – absolutely, but unfortunately, it’s another step we have to take.” Reid also extended her support to fellow homeowners, adding, “I’m here for anyone that needs me.”

• Fiona Crichton was disappointed by the condition of some of her items. “I picked up the washer/dryer from Park St today and drove it to Edinburgh, but it doesn’t work. So it was a complete waste of time,” she shared. The sight of her flat’s condition was distressing, with furniture “thrown to the side by the workmen to get into the roof.” She added, “My flat is on the top floor, and seeing it in that state was difficult.”

• Lynsey Maquater faced her own challenges during the process, struggling with logistics to retrieve her belongings. Although the council accommodated her need for a different entry date, a deeply personal item, a watch that once belonged to her father, could not be found. While there were no allegations of theft, the situation was upsetting for her and highlighted the emotional weight of the experience.

Looking Forward: Wilson Chowdhry Calls for Continued Support and Transparency from Clackmannanshire Council

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, stressed the importance of sustained support and transparency from Clackmannanshire Council as the RAAC crisis continues to affect homeowners. “While the re-entry process has provided some much-needed relief, it is crucial that the council remains proactive in addressing the broader concerns these families face,” Chowdhry stated. “The ongoing impact of RAAC on these residents cannot be overstated. The emotional and financial strain they’ve endured, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding the future of their properties, means that immediate action is necessary. We continue to urge the council to expedite fair property valuations and offer compensation to ease the significant burdens on displaced homeowners.”

Chowdhry further emphasized that these families, who have faced an abrupt and often disheartening process, are now pushing for the council to be accountable and transparent in their future decisions. “It's vital that homeowners can trust the process moving forward and know that their concerns are being addressed swiftly and fairly,” he added.

In response to the ongoing challenges, homeowners have announced a protest on 8th November, from 11am to 12pm outside Kilncraigs, Greenside Street, Alloa, FK10 1EB, ahead of a scheduled meeting with Kevin Wells, Strategic Director of Place, set to begin at 12pm. Homeowners are inviting others to join them in standing up for the fair treatment and support they desperately need.

Furthermore, homeowners are planning another protest on 13th November, from 9:30am to 10:30am outside the Scottish Parliament, to coincide with the consideration of a petition being heard by the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee. The petition calls for a national budget to assist RAAC homeowners, a public inquiry into the handling of the RAAC situation by councils, and legislative changes to prevent similar crises in the future. The UK RAAC petition is scheduled to be discussed around 10:50am, and homeowners are inviting all supporters to attend and show their solidarity.

“The fight is far from over,” Chowdhry concluded. “This is about securing the future of these homeowners and ensuring that no one else has to go through what they have. We need everyone’s voice in this movement to ensure that justice is served, and these families are treated with the fairness and respect they deserve.”