Thursday, 5 June 2025

Aberdeen City Council's RAAC Scheme: A Disgraceful Betrayal of a Community in Crisis

JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS  (CLICK HERE), OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) AND OFFICIAL UK GOVERNMENT PETITION (HERE).

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Watch the historic moment as the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee officially backs the UK RAAC Campaign Group’s petition—a groundbreaking step in our fight for justice and accountability! (here)

Please complete our impact survey (here) 

On 27 May 2025, Aberdeen City Council unveiled its long-awaited alternative options for homeowners affected by RAAC concrete. Sadly, what was billed as a set of new lifelines is in truth a cynical, limited, and exploitative package that continues to pile pressure on already distressed residents.

Let’s be clear: this scheme is not about empowering homeowners. It’s about controlling them.

Property Swaps – A Hollow Offer

Under the so-called “property swap” scheme, residents are being offered a straight exchange – but only into two-bedroom flats. This is wholly inadequate for many families currently living in larger homes, and completely disregards their needs, space requirements, and quality of life. There is no flexibility, no vision, and no attempt to match people’s real circumstances. It’s a one-size-fits-all insult.

Voluntary Acquisition – An Underhanded Undervaluation

The Voluntary Acquisition scheme remains fundamentally flawed. The Council continues to base its valuations on the current market value — a figure drastically depressed due to the declaration of RAAC. Homes that once had value and security have been stripped of both, and the Council now proposes to buy them at a slashed rate. This is not compensation — it’s coercion under duress, repackaged as support.

Roof Replacement Scheme – Eye-Watering Costs, No Autonomy

Perhaps most shocking of all is the new Roof Replacement scheme. The fixed costs to homeowners are eye-watering:

  • £20,000 for a 1-bed

  • £37,000 for a 3-bed

  • £44,000 for a 4-bed

These figures are at least double what a private contractor would charge. And crucially, homeowners cannot choose their own contractor, cannot control the quality or speed of the work, and are expected to entrust the entire process to the same Council that failed to protect them in the first place.

When I submitted proposals for loan support and a coordinated roof replacement pathway, my intent was clear: that homeowners should be able to secure funding and employ private contractors of their choice, provided all necessary consents, building regulations, and planning requirements were followed.  The loan scheme was always envisioned as being flexible, including the possibility of retrospective funding, should the UK or Scottish Governments step up and establish a national fund to address this crisis responsibly."

Instead, the Council has twisted this idea into a restrictive, top-down scheme that enriches contractors, consolidates Council control, and strips homeowners of all autonomy.

Loans: Empty Promises, No Clarity

The Council’s vague suggestion of “low-interest loans” or a “shared equity arrangement” offers no detail, no terms, and no timelines. What will the interest rate be? Who qualifies? Will this add to long-term debt burdens? None of this has been clarified, and homeowners are expected to make life-altering decisions within a matter of weeks, before the end of June.

Time Pressure and Emotional Blackmail

Giving homeowners less than a month to assess, digest, and respond to these complicated and often deeply unsatisfactory options is utterly unacceptable. Many are still coming to terms with the trauma of losing their homes and communities. Rushing them into irreversible choices is not just irresponsible — it’s cruel.

A Council Profiting from Misfortune

Let’s not mince words: this entire approach reeks of opportunism. Rather than acting as a protector of public wellbeing, Aberdeen City Council is positioning itself as a beneficiary of disaster, tightening its grip over vulnerable homeowners and forcing through measures that protect its own financial interests above all else.

This is not what public service is supposed to look like.

We Deserve Better

The residents of Balnagask and beyond deserve genuine support, flexible solutions, and respect. They deserve to be partners in the solution, not subjects of a broken system.

We call on Aberdeen City Council to:

  • Offer full-value compensation based on pre-RAAC declarations.

  • Expand property swap options to include properties that reflect actual homeowner needs.

  • Allow grant funding for private repairs with approved contractors, as originally intended.

  • Provide clear, detailed loan information — not vague promises.

  • Extend the deadline for responses to allow meaningful consultation.

Until then, this package remains what it is: a disgraceful betrayal of the very people the Council is supposed to serve.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The full text of the letter is provided below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RAAC – Alternative options agreed at Communities Housing and Public Protection Committee 

27 May 2025

Firstly, I understand that the identification of problems associated with Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in your property is causing you a lot of worry. The health and safety risks, financial implications, and loss of community are of great concern to homeowners. I also recognise that many homeowners do not want to go through the Voluntary Acquisitions process and are looking for a different way forward.

To find different ways to support homeowners facing these challenges and avert the need for any enforcement action, the Council asked that officers work with groups, like the Torry RAAC Campaign Group Management Committee, to find other ways the Council could support homeowners to remove the risk of the RAAC panels. As a result of these discussions, on Tuesday 27 May the Communities, Housing and Public Protection Committee agreed two further options to help homeowners.

The Committee asked that I write and share all of the different ways that the Council can support you to address the issue of RAAC in your home. This letter sets out the current and new options available to homeowners and asks that you consider which option would best suit you/your family.

An online survey has been set up to gather feedback on each option. If you require support to provide your feedback, please contact Jade Leyden at Greyhope Community Hub (tel: 01224 053684). Jade will also link with departments across the Council on your behalf to help answer any questions you may have. Please provide your feedback by the end of June as this will help us progress the new options for those that are interested.

Current Options

Voluntary Acquisition: An independent agency will value your property, and you won't need to provide a Home Report. The Council will buy your home at its current Market Value (the current Market Value will take into account the RAAC panels in the roof).

The Council will pay any professional fees you incur for valuation advice. The Council will also cover your legal fees for selling your home and any costs for buying a new one.

In addition, you will receive a home loss payment equal to 10% of your property's market value. The Council will also cover other costs like moving expenses and early mortgage surrender fees.

 We fully understand that every owner is in a slightly different position and can discuss particular challenges you/your family face, such as mortgage fees etc. with you directly if you choose to progress this option.

You will already have been contacted regarding this option and it remains open to you even if you have previously advised us that you do not want to engage.

Making your own home safe: Owners who live in mostly privately owned blocks or terraces can work together to address the risks independently of the Council.

Owners will be responsible for the costs for any works to their own properties but can ask the Council to cover their share of costs for any Council properties in the block or terrace.

If you are keen to collaborate with neighbours to progress this option, the Council can be asked to contribute its share of the costs. Further information is available here.

New Options – Approved in May 2025

Roof Replacement Proposals: Homeowners who want to retain a home in Balnagask can collaborate with the Council to replace the roof. If enough people show interest, the Council will identify terraces for roof replacement.

Interested homeowners could be allocated a property with a new timber roof similar in size to their own, and some owners may be able to keep their current property. Owners will need to move out during the works, and the Council will help cover these costs and provide decant options if these are required.

Replacing the roof is likely to cause some damage to properties and this will vary from property to property. The full extent of damage will not be identified until detailed surveys are undertaken and works start.

As a result, owners are being asked to contribute a set fee for the roof replacement so that they have certainty around costs. The set fee may be reduced, depending on final specifications and the result of openly tendered costs. The maximum set cost to owners is:

• £20,000 for a one-bedroom property

• £37,000 for a three-bedroom property

• £44,000 for a four-bedroom property

The Council will meet all other costs including but not limited to project management, legal fees, removal and storage, consents, safety checks, mortgage and security costs, and making homes ready for occupancy in light of the damage that could be caused when the roof is removed.

Owners will also be offered a £5,000 cash payment to help them make their house a home. Owners who do not require this payment could instead reduce £5,000 from the roof replacement cost.

The Council recognises that some owners may find it incredibly challenging to meet upfront costs. The Council is currently working to establish a mechanism to support homeowners through either a low cost loan or shared equity arrangement.

Property swap: Owners could swap their current property with a Council property (most likely a 2 bedroom flat). This would be in blocks of properties where the council is a minority owner and a sale to you would end council ownership in the block.

The value which would form part of the exchange would be based on the valuation identified for your property under the Voluntary Acquisition process. Council properties available for swap would also be valued by the Valuation Office Agency prior to any works being undertaken to ready properties for sale. If the values are different, either the owners or the Council will pay the difference.

The Council will pay any professional fees you incur for valuation advice. The Council will also cover your legal fees. In addition, you will receive a home loss payment equal to 10% of your property's market value. The Council will also cover other costs like moving expenses and early mortgage surrender fees.

The Council would be open to offering a loan/equity share arrangement for owners who require it to progress this option.

What happens next?

It would be helpful to understand which option(s) might work best for you and your family given the health, safety and financial risks associated with any further deterioration of the RAAC panels.

The Council has a legal duty to intervene where buildings are deemed dangerous or defective and cannot choose to not do so. If enforcement action were taken owners would be issued with notices requiring works, ordering evacuation, and undertaking emergency measures at the full cost to the owner. We are keen to ensure that no homeowner faces this situation and hope that offering additional options helps prevent enforcement action in recognition of the considerable strain this would place on owners. Further information on enforcement action can be accessed here.

As previously mentioned, we would be grateful if you could indicate which option would best support your family through on-line form by the end of June. This timescale will enable us to determine levels of interest in the new roof replacement and house swap options and interest must be registered by the end of June to opt into one of these two new options. Those not able to return the digital form should contact Jade Leyden at Greyhope Community Hub. Jade can be contacted by phone on 01224 053684 and will be happy to help you.

I understand that this situation continues to be challenging and stressful for you. Please know that the Council is committed to supporting you through this process. We are here to help you find the best solution for your home and ensure your safety and wellbeing. Our Partner SAMH continues to be available to you though hearforyou@samh.org.uk

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out to Jade in the first instance, Jade will then make sure that your questions are directed to the most appropriate officer. Together, we can navigate this challenging time and find a way forward.

Further information is available on the council’s updated FAQ’s.

https://www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/services/housing/raac-housing Online survey

www.raac-homeowners-2025.commonplace.is/

Further information on enforcement action

www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/services/planning-and-building-standards/building[1]standards/building-standards-policy-and-guidance/dangerous-and-defective-buildings

Further information on communal repairs www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/services/housing/communal-housing-repairs

Yours sincerely

Stephen Booth

Chief Officer Corporate Landlord

RAAC Scandal Demands Welsh Action: Open Letter Sent to First Minister and Housing Secretary

The UK’s Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) crisis is a national emergency—but one that still hasn’t received the transparent accountability it demands. Across the UK, thousands of people are living in limbo, displaced from their homes, burdened with repair bills, and overwhelmed by anxiety due to the risks posed by this unstable material.

Today, we have sent an open letter to Baroness Eluned Morgan MS, the First Minister of Wales, and Jayne Bryant MS, the Cabinet Secretary for Housing and Local Government, calling on the Welsh Government to take a decisive stand.

We are asking the Welsh Government to:

  • Support a statutory UK-wide Public Inquiry into the approval, promotion, and unchecked use of RAAC in public housing and infrastructure.

  • Acknowledge the scale of public concern, demonstrated by over 6,000 signatures on our UK Parliament petition, nearly 2,500 signatures on the Scottish Parliament petition, and 120 signatures on a new Welsh Government petition.

  • Develop contingency plans to protect Welsh citizens if the UK Government fails to act.

📝 Read the full open letter to the Welsh Government here:
👉 [Open Letter to Baroness Eluned Morgan and Jayne Bryant ]

✉️ Similar letters have also been sent to the UK Prime Minister and Housing Secretary (read here) and to the Scottish First Minister and Housing Minister (read here).

RAAC: More Than a Building Flaw—It’s a Political Scandal

RAAC, often nicknamed “aero-concrete” or “bubbly concrete,” was heralded as a revolutionary building material in the post-war years. Its light weight and low cost made it a go-to solution in schools, hospitals, and public housing. But we now know that it is dangerously unstable—prone to sudden collapse when exposed to water or prolonged wear.

What’s worse is that the risks were known for decades. Our open letter outlines clear evidence that politicians, construction firms, and public bodies either ignored or covered up the truth about RAAC. Among the most disturbing revelations:

  • Government-affiliated research bodies and commercial firms actively promoted RAAC despite concerns about its durability.

  • RAAC-containing housing systems such as Siporex and Skarne were pushed onto local authorities, often through pre-approved procurement systems.

  • Safety reviews, such as those triggered by the Ronan Point disaster, excluded Scottish (and likely Welsh) properties from scrutiny—despite clear evidence of risks across the UK.

Wales is not immune to these failings. Councils across the country may have unknowingly inherited RAAC buildings—some of which have only recently been identified through surveys. For many residents, those buildings remain their family homes, schools, or community spaces.

Why We Need the Welsh Government to Step Up

While responsibility for a full statutory inquiry rests with the UK Government, devolved governments must not sit idle. The Welsh Government has both a duty and an opportunity to protect its citizens and lead by example. Our open letter urges them to:

  • Apply political pressure on Westminster;

  • Publicly back the campaign for justice and transparency;

  • Take independent steps to assess and mitigate RAAC risk in Wales.

Baroness Morgan, Wales’s first female First Minister, has already broken barriers. We believe she can now make history again by ensuring that no Welsh resident is left behind in the pursuit of justice.

The Human Cost

Behind every RAAC failure is a family in crisis. We’ve met residents forced to flee their homes with only hours’ notice. Parents watching children attend school in buildings at risk of collapse. Pensioners living in fear as cracks deepen in their ceilings. People who bought homes unaware that RAAC lay hidden in their walls and roofs—only to discover that repairs cost more than the property is worth.

This is not just a construction issue. It is a human rights issue. It’s about the right to feel safe in your home, to trust public institutions, and to receive justice when things go wrong.

A Call for Justice

Our campaign is built not on politics but on people. We welcome the chance to work with both the Welsh and UK Governments to bring clarity, accountability, and restitution to all who have suffered.

But if action continues to be delayed, the moral responsibility will fall on devolved leaders like Baroness Morgan and Jayne Bryant to act. That is why we have written to them today.

We ask our supporters and concerned residents in Wales to:

Together, we can expose the truth about RAAC, demand justice for the families affected, and ensure that a scandal like this can never happen again.

Wednesday, 4 June 2025

How RAAC Was Promoted Despite the Warnings: A Letter to the Prime Minister

JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS  (CLICK HERE), OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) AND OFFICIAL UK GOVERNMENT PETITION (HERE).

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Watch the historic moment as the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee officially backs the UK RAAC Campaign Group’s petition—a groundbreaking step in our fight for justice and accountability! (here)

Please complete our impact survey (here) 

Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
10 Downing Street
London, SW1A 2AA

Cc: Rt Hon Angela Rayner MP
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
2 Marsham Street
London, SW1P 4DF

OPEN LETTER:  Urgent Request for a Public Inquiry into the Use of RAAC in Public Buildings and Housing

[This letter has been emailed to the PM, Secretary of State and Ministers. Printed copies are scheduled for hand-delivery to 10 Downing Street on Tuesday, 10th June at 2:00 PM.]

Dear Prime Minister and Secretary of State,

I am writing to urge the immediate establishment of a statutory Public Inquiry into the historic approval, promotion, and widespread use of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in public housing and infrastructure across the United Kingdom. Mounting evidence indicates that the adoption of RAAC was not simply a matter of engineering misjudgment, but rather a profound failure of public oversight, transparency, and accountability.

To this day, thousands of UK residents remain displaced, at risk, or caught in limbo due to structural failures associated with RAAC. However, the roots of this crisis run deeper than the material itself. The public deserves answers to how this dangerous substance came to be so widely used despite early warnings. Notably:

  • Costain Group conducted research for the British Research Establishment (BRE), which directly influenced the approval of RAAC for use in system-built housing.
  • Richard Costain facilitated visits for UK politicians to Sweden to promote RAAC technology and partnered with the Edinburgh Research Unit (ERU) to develop the first Siporex towers in Scotland.
  • The ERU later created an automated building design system directing councils and the Scottish Special Housing Association (SSHA) to use specific pre-approved construction systems—such as Skarne, Jespersen, and Bison—all of which incorporated RAAC.
  • During this period, Albert Costain MP, a former Costain Group director and shareholder, promoted system-built housing in Parliament—raising serious questions about conflicts of interest and influence over public procurement.
  • Following the Ronan Point disaster, a safety review into system-built housing was mandated—but it was conducted by the BRE, an institution that had previously promoted these systems. Alarmingly, Scottish housing was excluded from that review, allowing structural risks tied to Siporex and RAAC to go unexamined.

Further troubling evidence includes:

  • In 1987, Edinburgh Council acknowledged RAAC-related roof risks by commissioning steel reinforcement over asbestos roofs at 159–163 Crewe Road North (Edinburgh Evening News, 22 June 1987). Later council claims that these works had no relation to RAAC have proven misleading.
  • A 1989 article in The Glasgow Observer revealed that homes in Livingston saw their value slashed by two-thirds after structural surveys condemned RAAC roofs. Although Siporex-related defects had already emerged in Basildon, Mr Gordon Davies, technical director of Livingston Development Corporation, assured the public that similar risks were unlikely in Livingston. This proved untrue, yet homes continued to be sold to unsuspecting buyers.
  • A 1967 article in the Reading Evening Post described Siporex as a remarkable new material that “floats”—even comparing it to cheese that could be “sawn” or “nailed.” In reality, RAAC is dangerously water-sensitive and disintegrates when wet. Such promotional misinformation helped normalize the use of an inherently unstable product.
  • A 2005 City of Edinburgh Council report confirmed the use of Siporex in non-traditional housing, based on a structural survey by Curtins Consulting—who now manufacture the very steel support systems being installed in Dundee to address RAAC risks. This suggests long-standing awareness and potential conflicts of interest.
  • In 2017, the Lanarkshire Valuation Joint Board classified Siporex as RAAC in official guidance, identifying its widespread use in Cumbernauld during the 1960s and 70s. This contradicts subsequent denials by North and South Lanarkshire Councils that they knew of its presence or dangers.
  • A 1989 Evening Chronicle article shows Newcastle City Council had already identified serious RAAC defects in homes with "Siporex roofs" by that time—further confirming that the risks were known and documented decades ago.
  • As early as 1959, Siporex was marketed in Scotland as a revolutionary material, claimed to be “non-combustible” and comparable to stone. Crucial information about its moisture vulnerability and long-term deterioration was conveniently omitted.

Taken together, these failures—technical, regulatory, and ethical—have left a trail of destruction: structural instability, financial devastation, and psychological trauma for countless families. Piecemeal responses and deflections of responsibility are no longer acceptable.

We therefore call for a full statutory Public Inquiry with powers to:

  1. Investigate the original approval, research, and promotion of RAAC—including the roles of BRE, Costain Group, ERU, and relevant government departments;
  2. Examine the influence of corporate lobbying and potential conflicts of interest in housing policy and procurement;
  3. Review the Ronan Point safety investigations and the exclusion of Scottish properties from scrutiny;
  4. Assess the human, financial, and psychological toll on affected residents and the adequacy of current remediation and compensation;
  5. Recommend structural reforms to prevent such regulatory failures from recurring.

This matter demands urgent and transparent action. Public confidence in the safety of our homes and in government decision-making cannot be restored without full disclosure, accountability, and justice.

I would welcome an opportunity to meet with you both in person to present the evidence we have collated and to discuss the urgent need for a Public Inquiry. I would also be keen to contribute further evidence to any inquiry process and to support its formation in any way necessary.


Yours sincerely

Wilson Chowdhry

Chaorman UK RAAC Campaign Group

Thursday, 29 May 2025

UK RAAC Campaign Group Submits Urgent Plea to Welsh Government Over Crumbling Gower Estate Homes


If you are a Welsh resident, please show your support by signing our petition to the Welsh Government: https://petitions.senewales/petitdd.ions/246606

JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR  OFFICIAL UK GOVERNMENT PETITION (HERE).

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Please complete our impact survey (here) 

Cardiff, 29 May 2025 — At 2:30pm today, Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, formally delivered two powerful open letters and a supporting petition to the Senedd at Pierhead Street, Cardiff, addressed to Welsh First Minister Rt Hon Eluned Morgan MS and Minister for Housing Rt Hon Jayne Bryant MS.

The letters highlight the worsening crisis facing homeowners in Hirwaun’s Gower Estate, where properties built with Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) have become structurally unsafe, leaving residents exposed to grave physical, emotional, and financial harm.

Demanding Urgent and Fair Support

Chowdhry’s submissions were made on behalf of both the UK RAAC Campaign Group and the CYMRU RAAC Campaign Group, who have worked closely to assess the impact of the Welsh Government’s current support framework. The message is clear: existing financial assistance schemes are woefully inadequate and exclude the majority of those most in need.

A recent local survey of residents on the Gower Estate revealed that only 2 out of 10 homeowners would qualify for government grants based on restrictive eligibility criteria. Most are ruled out because they are not receiving certain benefits, haven't occupied their homes long enough, or possess limited savings that disqualify them.

In his letter to the First Minister and Housing Minister, Chowdhry writes:

“While grant schemes may exist on paper, they fail to address the needs of real residents living in unsafe and deteriorating conditions. These individuals — many of them elderly — are being asked to pay the price for historic construction failures they could not have foreseen or prevented.”

Call for Government Action

The letters set out a series of concrete demands, including:

  • The creation of a dedicated financial support scheme for all RAAC-affected homeowners, including private landlords.

  • Reform of grant criteria to reflect the urgency of structural risks — not merely means-tested poverty thresholds.

  • Introduction of interest-free loans or remediation grants regardless of benefit status.

  • Collaboration with the UK Government and other devolved nations to build a UK-wide housing remediation strategy.

Chowdhry warns that unless the Welsh Government responds with compassion and urgency, the Gower Estate could become “a blueprint for how not to manage a national housing emergency.”

Systemic Failures and the Burden on the Vulnerable

The letters also expose a wider issue: RAAC was never disclosed during the sales of these ex-council properties, leaving homeowners unaware of the life-altering risks they were inheriting. Many of these individuals bought their homes under the UK Government’s Right to Buy scheme, with hopes of security and stability — dreams now shattered.

Additionally, the Gower Estate lies in one of Wales' most socio-economically disadvantaged communities, compounding the impact of this crisis. Without immediate intervention, residents — many of them pensioners — face the threat of bankruptcy or homelessness.

A National Response for a National Crisis

The letters urge the Welsh Government to take a leadership role in advocating for broader reforms, including:

  • Introduction of government-backed, interest-free mortgages for homeowners whose properties have become uninhabitable due to no-fault structural safety defects such as RAAC.

  • The restoration of first-time buyer status for displaced homeowners.

  • A reformed Building Safety Act 2022 that finally puts homeowners first, offering lasting protection against hidden construction faults and safety failures.

  • A Creation of a national ‘High Risk Homes Register’ to protect future buyers from hidden dangers.

A Formal Request for Dialogue

Finally, the letters conclude with a respectful request for a face-to-face meeting with ministers, alongside representatives from the CYMRU and UK RAAC Campaign Groups, to chart a pathway toward practical and inclusive solutions.

Wilson Chowdhry summarised the urgency in a closing statement:

“These homeowners are not looking for handouts. They are simply asking for fairness, transparency, and the same dignity every citizen deserves — the right to live in a safe home. It’s time the Welsh Government responded not just with policy, but with humanity.”

Friday, 23 May 2025

Hirwaun RAAC Safety Emergency: Open Letter & Petition for Senedd Consideration


Below is our open letter to the Welsh Government, urgently requesting financial support for elderly homeowners living in RAAC-affected properties. These vulnerable residents have been overlooked, while politicians deflect responsibility by citing an inadequate and inapplicable grant scheme offered by the local council.

If you are a Welsh resident, please show your support by signing our petition to the Welsh Government: https://petitions.senedd.wales/petitions/246606

OPEN LETTER

To:
Rt Hon Eluned Morgan MS
First Minister for Wales
Welsh Government
Cardiff Bay
Cardiff
CF99 1NA

Rt Hon Jayne Bryant MS
Minister for Housing
Welsh Government
Cardiff Bay


Re: RAAC-Affected Homes in Hirwaun – Inaccuracies in Welsh Government Letter Dated 22 April 2025

Dear First Minister and Minister for Housing,

I am writing this open letter in response to a letter received by Lesley Lewis, leader of the CYMRU RAAC Campaign Group, from Mr. Richard Baker, Deputy Director of the Place Division at Welsh Government, dated 22 April 2025 (click here). The letter sought to address the deeply concerning issue of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in homes at the Gower Estate in Hirwaun.

As Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, I appreciate the Welsh Government’s engagement on this critical matter and its recognition of the emotional and financial burden RAAC has placed on residents. However, it is important to correct several inaccuracies and misrepresentations in the original response that risk obscuring the reality faced by affected homeowners.


1. Grants Are Inaccessible to Private Landlords

The letter references grant schemes intended to assist owner-occupiers, yet private landlords — who are equally responsible for homes with RAAC and whose tenants are directly impacted — are completely excluded from these schemes. These landlords have no access to support, despite the urgency of repairs required for tenant safety.


2. Most Homeowners Are Disqualified by Restrictive Criteria

The eligibility conditions for Maintenance Repair Assistance and Renovation Grant Assistance — as outlined in the annex to Mr. Baker’s letter — are so restrictive that they exclude the vast majority of RAAC-affected homeowners at the Gower Estate. Reasons for ineligibility include:

  • Not receiving the specific benefits required;
  • Not meeting the five-year occupancy threshold;
  • Exceeding equity or savings thresholds.

To demonstrate the real-world impact of these criteria, the CYMRU RAAC Campaign Group conducted a local survey. The results are revealing: out of 10 respondents, only 2 homeowners potentially qualify for any grant assistance.

Summary of Survey Results:

Date

5+ Years in Home

Benefits Received

Likely Eligible

14/05/2025

Yes

None

14/05/2025

Yes

None

14/05/2025

Yes

Council Tax Reduction, UC

14/05/2025

No

None

14/05/2025

Yes

None

14/05/2025

Yes

None

14/05/2025

Yes

Pension Credit Guarantee

15/05/2025

Yes

None

16/05/2025

Yes

None

21/05/2025

Yes

None

This evidence underscores that while grant schemes may exist on paper, they fail to address the needs of real residents who are living in unsafe and deteriorating conditions.


3. Urgent Need for Tailored Government Support

Given the gravity and urgency of the RAAC crisis, we call on the Welsh Government to take the following actions:

  • Establish a dedicated financial support scheme for RAAC-affected private homeowners and landlords;
  • Broaden existing eligibility criteria to reflect the urgent structural risks, not just means-tested poverty;
  • Introduce interest-free loans or remediation grants regardless of benefit status;
  • Coordinate with the UK Government and other devolved nations to build a UK-wide RAAC housing response strategy.

The grant criteria, as outlined in Mr. Baker’s letter, may appear reasonable in policy terms, but they fail catastrophically in practice. The vast majority of residents at the Gower Estate are elderly and extremely vulnerable, many of whom are already experiencing heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and isolation as a direct result of the deteriorating state of their homes and the uncertainty surrounding their futures. These are individuals who have worked their entire lives, only to find themselves trapped in unsafe housing and excluded from support mechanisms intended to protect them.

In addition, every private landlord and homeowner on the estate purchased these ex-council properties in good faith, completely unaware that RAAC had been used in the roof construction — a decision made as a cost-saving measure during their original build. This critical information was never disclosed during the sale of the properties. Despite the existence of early warnings about RAAC as far back as 1996, and some reports indicating concerns arose even during the construction phase, no effective action was taken to flag these properties as high risk, leaving successive buyers exposed to life-changing financial and structural risks through no fault of their own.

It is also important to highlight that the Gower Estate is located in one of the most deprived areas in Wales, as identified by the national Indices of Multiple Deprivation. Residents here already face severe disadvantages in terms of health outcomes, household income, and access to essential services. The sudden and overwhelming financial burden now placed on them — whether for essential structural surveys, emergency accommodation, or full-scale roof remediation — is entirely unaffordable for most. Without urgent intervention, this crisis threatens to push many families and pensioners into bankruptcy or homelessness. The weight of this burden is not just financial but deeply personal, with individuals facing the devastating prospect of losing homes they have lived in for decades, in communities they helped to build and sustain.


We respectfully request a meeting with the Welsh Government to discuss a pathway to more inclusive, practical and compassionate support, and would welcome the participation of members of both the UK RAAC Campaign Group and the CYMRU RAAC Campaign Group.

Sincerely,

Wilson Chowdhry
Chairman, UK RAAC Campaign Group