Dundee Homeowners Launch RAAC Justice Campaign: Petition, Protests, and Community Action

Wilson Chowdhry, Kerry Mackintosh, Wayne Hoskins and Yvette Hoskins

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

RAAC-affected homeowners in Dundee have launched a campaign for justice after being caught in a financial crisis over the purchase of ex-council homes built in the 1960s with Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) roofs. In October, we reported on the struggles of Wayne Hoskins, who received only a single letter from the council notifying him that his roof contained RAAC. The council then left him to address the issue alone. When Mr. Hoskins later attempted to sell his home, he discovered that traditional estate agents wouldn’t list it, and even after lowering the price by £30,000 for auction, he was still unable to sell due to mortgage companies refusing loans to potential buyers.

Wilson and Kerry went door-to-door, meeting with affected homeowners to hear their concerns firsthand.

Wayne Hoskins reached out to the UK RAAC Campaign Group, where Chairman Wilson Chowdhry highlighted Mr. Hoskins’ case, drawing interest from The Dundee Courier, who published an article outlining his challenges. Mr. Chowdhry has since reached out to Dundee City Council multiple times to request a deputation, but the council has not prioritized RAAC as an agenda item, effectively blocking public discussion. He also encouraged Mr. Hoskins to request that his local councillors introduce an agenda item on RAAC, but there has been no progress to date.

Meanwhile, Mr. Chowdhry advised Mr. Hoskins to create a Facebook group, "Dundee RAAC Campaign Group," which has attracted nearly 200 homeowners and tenants facing similar issues. Many of these supporters have signed a petition Mr. Chowdhry and his daughter Hannah submitted on the Scottish Parliament website, which has now surpassed 1,600 signatures.

The petition has three principal demands:

1. Establish a national fund to support homeowners and tenants affected by RAAC.
2. Initiate a public inquiry into the actions of councils and housing associations regarding RAAC.
3. Enact or update legislation to hold developers, councils, and housing associations accountable for using substandard materials, mandate full disclosure of risks, and make surveyors and solicitors liable for undiscovered defects.

The petition is set to be reviewed by the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday, November 13, and could lead to one of the following outcomes:

• A request for written information from the Scottish Government, local authorities, and relevant organizations.
• An invitation for the petitioner to share personal stories directly with the committee.
• A referral of the petition to another committee for in-depth review.
• Recommendations for the Scottish Government to establish a financial support fund for RAAC homeowners.
• A debate in the Scottish Parliament Chamber to raise awareness and build further support.

Notably, the petition has received support letters from two MSPs—a rare endorsement on the Scottish Parliament petition site. Murdo Fraser MSP (Mid Scotland and Fife) and Edward Mountain MSP (Highlands and Islands) have backed the petition, and Liam Kerr MSP is expected to discuss it during the hearing.

On Saturday, November 9, Wilson Chowdhry and Kerry Mackintosh from the UK RAAC Campaign visited Wayne and his wife Yvette to plan a protest and a community meeting. The protest is scheduled for Saturday, November 23, at City Square, outside Caird Hall, from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., followed by the first meeting of the Dundee RAAC Campaign Group at Downfield Mains Church, 39 Haldane Crescent, Dundee, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. After the meeting, Wilson and Kerry visited all local RAAC-affected properties in Mr. Hoskins' area, providing residents with updates and details about their campaign. Mr. Chowdhry has since obtained official permission from local police to hold the protest.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of UK RAAC Campaign Group, said:  

"Homeowners like Wayne Hoskins have been left abandoned, with properties they can’t sell and debts they can’t escape," said Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group. "The councils and government must take responsibility for the financial and emotional turmoil the RAAC scandal has caused. We’re determined to fight for a national fund and real accountability for everyone impacted by RAAC across Scotland."

The UK RAAC Campaign Group is also inviting supporters to join a protest outside the Scottish Parliament on 13th November 2024, from 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., and to sign their online petitions (here) and (here).

RAAC-Affected Homeowners Outraged by Councillor’s Hostile Demeanor, Fear Unfair Council Decisions

Evacuated RAAC homeowners from Tillicoultry gather in the foyer of Kilncraigs with Wilson Chowdhry of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, awaiting their meeting with Council leaders.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Tillicoultry, Clackmannanshire – Displaced residents from Tillicoultry affected by the RAAC (Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete) crisis were left disheartened and angry after a recent Clackmannanshire Council meeting (8th November) intended to update them on housing and safety options. Having faced the trauma of evacuation from structurally compromised homes, months of difficult temporary accommodation, and an uncertain future, homeowners arrived hoping for support, answers, and a demonstration of empathy from council leaders. Unfortunately, the meeting only deepened their sense of being marginalized.

Homeowners gathered before the meeting

Wilson Chowdhry expressed concerns that the removal of Wilson Lees from their role in liaising with homeowners had undermined their position. He emphasized that, as previously agreed in meetings and through electronic correspondence with Murray Sharp, Wilson Lees, and Andrew Buchanan, one of the proposals should include a valuation of homeowners' properties based on their worth prior to the RAAC declaration.Mr. Wells confirmed that a pre-RAAC declaration valuation would indeed be submitted as one proposal amongst many, alongside an assessment of the impact on the council, homeowners, and other stakeholders. He clarified that councillors would make a recommendation after carefully considering all relevant factors, stating, “We cannot pre-empt the councillors’ recommendation.”

During the meeting, Rebecca Doherty a homeowner became visibly emotional as she explained her struggles, breaking down while sharing the burden of paying both her mortgage and rent, alongside council tax for her new property. Her heartfelt plea for assistance in the form of a council tax discount left a powerful impact on those present. In response, Mr. Wells acknowledged the difficulty of her situation and advised that someone from the council would assess her case to determine what financial support could be offered. However, he clarified that due to strict regulations, a waiver for council tax was unlikely.

Seeing the broader implications for other homeowners in similar positions, Mr. Chowdhry intervened and requested that the same financial assessment be offered to all affected residents, which Mr. Wells agreed to. To facilitate this, contact details were exchanged, allowing council officers to reach out directly to homeowners for further assistance.

Mr. Chowdhry requested an opportunity for public participation at the upcoming Full Council meeting where the options report would be discussed. Councillor McTaggart replied that Clackmannanshire Council currently lacks a procedure allowing public involvement in such meetings. Aware of the council’s procedures, Mr. Chowdhry inquired whether a suspension of standing orders might allow this participation. Cllr. McTaggart acknowledged that it was possible, but noted that it could be unlikely, as it might set a precedent for future meetings.

Mr. Wells then clarified that, as per prior conversations and email exchanges with Mr. Chowdhry, he had already raised the suspension request with the Chief Executive, highlighting the urgency of allowing distressed, evacuated homeowners a platform to voice their concerns. He also confirmed his ongoing efforts to advance a third petition through the council, which, if approved, could create a pathway for public participation.

Additionally, Mr. Wells clarified that any discussion in the council chamber would focus strictly on the petition itself rather than the broader proposal. Mr. Chowdhry noted that this stance differed from previous council communications, but he agreed that the petition's wording could still lead to a meaningful dialogue.

The meeting quickly turned tense, with homeowners questioning the council’s timeline for delivering a long-promised options report and sharing concerns about the suitability and duration of their current housing arrangements. Councillor Jane McTaggert’s few comments, however, came across as dismissive, adding to residents' frustrations. “This meeting was our chance to understand what lies ahead, but Cllr McTaggert’s responses felt like a rebuff to our genuine concerns,” Lynsey Macquater said. Her remark, “We are doing everything we can?” in response to one resident’s plea for clarity on the timeline, struck many as lacking empathy and awareness of the difficult position homeowners are in.

One of the meeting’s most poignant moments occurred when Jimmy Vallance, a resident affected by the RAAC crisis, tried to describe the trauma he and his wife Fiona have faced. Emotionally overwhelmed, Jimmy broke down, unable to continue. Fiona took over, sharing their daily struggle: “Jimmy and I cannot speak. We are consumed by this from the minute we wake up every day. From our temporary home we hear every noise from upstairs, and everything of ours is still in boxes. We have been lying on a rubber mattress covered with mould.” Jimmy then interrupted, capturing the depth of their anguish, saying, “You are lucky that we are both still here,” a stark expression of the extreme emotional toll this crisis has taken on them.

A 1 hour protest took place from 11:00 - 12:00 prior to the meeting.

Instead of offering empathy, Councillor Jane McTaggert responded with a statement that left the room in silence. “You don’t know how we are feeling, do you think we are enjoying this? It’s hard on us too,” she said, a comment that homeowners felt was dismissive of their suffering. Her tone and phrasing, described as “condescending” by several attendees, often left the room in stunned silence.

At this particularly tense moment in the meeting, Kevin Wells, Strategic Director - Place, stepped in to address the residents’ concerns with a more understanding approach. “We can never fully understand what you are all going through, and I do appreciate it is a challenging time,” he acknowledged. “From our perspective, this is always at the top of our list. There are limitations to what we can do as a council. The housing officer is us reaching out. I’m sorry if that doesn’t seem like enough. We are trying to do what we can. We are more than happy to explore what we can do for you with all of you.” Wells’ response provided a brief sense of relief, but the meeting's overall tone had already left many residents feeling alienated. “We’re already in limbo. We needed empathy and understanding, but it felt like we were being scolded for asking for clarity,” shared one resident after the meeting.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK Campaign Group and an advocate for the RAAC-affected homeowners, expressed deep concern over the council’s approach. “This meeting was an opportunity for the council to demonstrate compassion and to reassure residents that their voices are being heard. Instead, residents were met with defensiveness and a lack of urgency. Cllr McTaggert’s tone throughout the meeting eroded the confidence of already beleaguered residents,” he said.

Despite everything they have endured, homeowners remain positive, finding strength in their solidarity.

However, some practical outcomes did emerge from the meeting. Residents were informed that a Full Council Meeting, set for 30th January, will include the presentation of the council’s options report for RAAC-affected homes. To ensure residents’ priorities are fully represented, Kevin Wells invited them to submit a list of specific outcomes and requests, which Mr. Chowdhry will prepare on their behalf, engaging with Mr. Wells in the coming months. Additionally, Mr. Wells is working to facilitate the approval of a residents' petition and is exploring the suspension of standing orders to allow Mr. Chowdhry to represent homeowners directly during the Full Council Meeting.

Despite these efforts, the RAAC-affected homeowners left the meeting feeling doubtful about the council’s commitment to providing an impartial, well-considered options report. Many fear that the council’s handling of the crisis may be biased, given the dismissive tone exhibited during the meeting. “We worry now that any options report delivered by this council will reflect the same lack of empathy we encountered today. If Cllr McTaggert’s approach is indicative of broader council attitudes, it’s hard to have faith in a fair outcome,” said one homeowner.

As residents prepare to attend the upcoming Full Council Meeting, they remain determined to ensure their voices are heard. “These homeowners have already endured more than enough,” continued Chowdhry. “They deserve transparency, respect, and a real plan for their futures. We will continue to stand with them, pushing for a process that is both fair and empathetic.”

This experience has only strengthened their resolve to hold Clackmannanshire Council accountable as they await the council’s options report and its decisions on their futures.

Political Momentum Grows Behind Petition by UK RAAC Campaign Group as MSPs and MPs Urge Action on RAAC-Homes Crisis

L-R Wilson Chowdhry, Wayne Hoskins and Mrs Hoskins Mr Hoskins home in Dundee.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

As the crisis of RAAC (Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete) continues to devastate homeowners across Scotland, political support for Petition PE2113—calling on the Scottish Government to take action for affected communities—has gained substantial momentum. A growing number of Scottish Parliament Members (MSPs) are joining the call for justice, urging both the Scottish Government and local authorities to step up with a comprehensive support system for homeowners facing negative equity and housing instability due to the RAAC crisis.

Several MSPs have already demonstrated their commitment to the petition, which seeks the creation of a national fund, the initiation of a public inquiry, and updated legislation to better support RAAC homeowners. This petition, unique in the level of support from MSPs, is a rare occurrence on the Scottish Parliament’s petition website. No other petition has received as many written submissions from MSPs endorsing it, significantly strengthening its case.

Murdo Fraser MSP, in his submission to the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, highlighted the urgent need for action, stating:
"I believe that the Scottish Government needs to investigate appropriate financial support for these individuals who have been left in this very unfortunate position. I strongly support the petition’s asks for a national fund and public inquiry." Fraser further emphasized the need for a public response from the Scottish Government to address the situation.

Similarly, Edward Mountain MSP, after meeting with RAAC protestors in September 2024, expressed his deep concern and support for the petition. In his written submission, he said:
"I was deeply saddened to hear some of the protestors’ personal stories; so many of them are losing their homes, and yet there is no adequate compensation scheme in place. I believe the petition’s asks are reasonable—setting up a national fund, initiating a public inquiry, and ensuring that legislation is updated." Mountain added that he was disappointed these measures had not been implemented sooner, noting the urgency of the crisis.

This level of political support, including from key MSPs like Murdo Fraser and Edward Mountain, could be pivotal in achieving a positive response from the Scottish Government. The petition committee now has a clear path forward, and there are several potential outcomes for the petition, such as:

• Requesting written information from the Scottish Government, local authorities, and other relevant organizations.
• Inviting the petitioner to speak directly to the committee to share personal stories and further insights.
• Referring the petition to another committee for detailed scrutiny.
• Recommending actions for the Scottish Government, including the establishment of a dedicated financial support fund for RAAC homeowners.
• Requesting a debate in the Scottish Parliament Chamber to raise awareness and garner further support for affected homeowners.

In an encouraging development, Liam Kerr MSP, who has shown an active interest in the petition, is confirmed to attend the petition consideration meeting. The Petition Committee clerk informed the petitioner:
"Where an MSP has noted their interest in a petition, we will notify them when the petition is scheduled for consideration, and they are welcome to attend the Committee meeting. While it remains at the Convener’s discretion whether to invite non-Committee MSPs to speak on a particular petition, MSPs will typically be invited to make a brief contribution to assist the Committee with its deliberations. We currently have Liam Kerr MSP listed as an interested MSP for your petition, and will notify him when a date for the consideration has been confirmed."

Mr. Liam Kerr urged Shona Robison to address the anger among homeowners who are boycotting a voluntary purchase scheme until the “RAAC penalty”—deducting repair costs from property values—is removed. With RAAC repair costs estimated between £40,000 and £71,000 per property, these deductions could significantly reduce payouts, potentially leaving owners in negative equity. Kerr attributed the issue to government underfunding of Aberdeen Council and questioned whether the Scottish Government would intervene. Robison acknowledged the concerns about negative equity and repair costs, expressing willingness to discuss further and consider RAAC issues in future budget planning.

Following correspondence from a constituent, Niamh Thomson from Shona Robison MSP's office expressed sympathy for Mr. Hoskins and other homeowners affected by RAAC in Dundee City Council properties. However, she clarified that the issue is predominantly legal, limiting MSP involvement. She stated, "I understand that this will be primarily a legal dispute, and I was glad to read that you have sought advice from a solicitor in this matter. Due to the legal nature of this complaint, there will be a limit on the assistance that our office can provide, as MSPs are not permitted to become involved in legal disputes." It remains unclear whether Mr. Kerr is aware of Ms. Robison’s stance, which suggests that affected homeowners pursue costly legal action rather than seeking financial support from the Scottish Government to address their RAAC crisis.

Mr. Liam Kerr has also informed Wilson Chowdhry that Audrey Nicoll MSP will be raising a portfolio question on the RAAC issue this week, as mentioned by Liam Kerr. He’s also attempting to secure an opportunity to address the issue during First Minister's Questions, though he notes that getting a question in at FMQs can be difficult.

Mr. Liam Kerr urged Shona Robison to address the anger among homeowners who are boycotting a voluntary purchase scheme until the “RAAC penalty”—deducting repair costs from property values—is removed. With RAAC repair costs estimated between £40,000 and £71,000 per property, these deductions could significantly reduce payouts, potentially leaving owners in negative equity. Kerr attributed the issue to government underfunding of Aberdeen Council and questioned whether the Scottish Government would intervene. Robison acknowledged the concerns about negative equity and repair costs, expressing willingness to discuss further and consider RAAC issues in future budget planning.

Stephen Flynn MP, leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP) in the House of Commons, recently wrote to the UK Government’s Chancellor to express his concern over the refusal to allocate funding for RAAC-affected homeowners. In his letter, Flynn stated:
"Whilst I note that £1 billion has been allocated in your Budget for RAAC hospital repairs, with an additional £1.4 billion for schools, I am extremely concerned by the omission of funding for RAAC-affected housing. It is clear the UK Government intends to continue dragging its heels on providing any support for the many people across the UK impacted by this issue."

Flynn emphasized that the RAAC crisis is a UK-wide problem that demands an immediate response from the UK Government. He continued:
"This is a UK-wide issue that must be met with a response from the UK Government, and I urge you to put in place funding for those people affected."

His statement highlights the urgent need for financial assistance for homeowners facing the devastating consequences of RAAC, and his condemnation of the UK Government’s lack of action adds to the growing pressure on both the UK and Scottish Governments to address the issue.

Local councils, however, are still struggling to find viable solutions. Aberdeen City Council, for example, proposed voluntary agreements for homeowners but excluded the substantial costs of repairs, leaving residents facing tens of thousands of pounds in losses. These proposals have been met with widespread rejection by affected homeowners. Additionally, West Lothian Council’s Julie Whitelaw expressed the council's position on the issue in a recent communication to petitioners:

"Providing financial assistance for all repair work associated with RAAC would be a significant undertaking. While we understand the challenges faced by homeowners, we must consider the broader implications of such a policy within the context of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. [...] The council’s current focus is on advice and guidance. We acknowledge that there may be instances where financial support could be beneficial, but such assistance for RAAC alone does not align with the principles of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006."

Whitelaw’s letter reflects the broader issue homeowners face in addressing the crisis, as councils focus largely on providing non-financial advice rather than direct financial support.

The ongoing support for Petition PE2113 from both Murdo Fraser MSP and Edward Mountain MSP, along with the confirmation of Liam Kerr MSP’s attendance at the petition consideration, marks a critical moment for RAAC homeowners. With strong political backing, the petition has the potential to force the Scottish Government to take immediate action—both legislatively and financially—to support the families who are suffering the consequences of RAAC. 

UK RAAC Campaign Group was to place more pressure on the Scottish Parlaiment's Petition Committe and are urging people moved by this issue to join them at a protest outside the Scottish Parliament on November 13th

Scottish Parliament Protest Organized by the UK RAAC Campaign Group

Date: Wednesday, 13th November 2024
Time: 9:30 - 10:30 am
Location: Scottish Parliament Building, Holyrood, Edinburgh, EH99

Details:
Join us as we gather outside the Scottish Parliament ahead of a crucial session at 10:50 am, where an online petition will be considered. This petition calls for the establishment of a national fund, necessary legislative reforms, and a public inquiry into the RAAC crisis impacting homeowners across Scotland.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, expressed gratitude to MPs and MSPs for their growing support in addressing the RAAC crisis and emphasized the urgency of establishing a national fund to support affected homeowners. He stated:

"I am deeply grateful to the MPs and MSPs who have shown solidarity with RAAC homeowners, standing alongside us in the call for meaningful action and financial support. The Scottish Government now has an opportunity to lead by example and do what is right for its people—by ensuring a robust national fund is put in place to support those impacted by this crisis. I encourage everyone who is affected or concerned by the RAAC situation to join us in our protest outside the Scottish Parliament on 13th November from 9:30 to 10:30 am. Together, we can amplify our message and press for the justice and support these families urgently deserve.

Emotional Re-Entry for RAAC-Evacuated Tillicoultry Homeowners as Clackmannanshire Council Coordinates Valuable Item Retrieval

An AMC removal van parked outside the evacuated Tillicoultry flats, ready to assist with the removal of residents' belongings.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Tillicoultry, Clackmannanshire, 6th November 2024 – After over one year of displacement and logistical setbacks, RAAC-affected homeowners in Tillicoultry are finally being granted one final access to their homes to retrieve essential belongings. This emotional milestone, coordinated by Clackmannanshire Council with support from Kevin Wells and Wilson Lees, follows a prolonged struggle to address the practical and psychological toll of displacement for the affected families.

The road to this re-entry process has been a complex one. Initially, homeowners had been in frequent communication with Wilson Lees, the Homelessness and Supporting People Manager, who maintained regular contact with residents over WhatsApp for a year. “Wilson was our primary connection with the council when things were at their most confusing,” said one homeowner. “His support helped us feel like someone in the council understood what we were going through.”

A liveried Clackmannanshire Council van was utilized by officers to assist with the re-entry process.

In the early stages, Wilson Lees had suggested that accompanied re-entries might be feasible. However, when a scheduled meeting on 22nd September was unexpectedly cancelled by Strategic Director of Place, Kevin Wells, homeowners were left in limbo. The sudden termination of the dedicated WhatsApp group—a crucial communication lifeline—added to the confusion, leaving many feeling abandoned by the council.

This cancellation was a major setback for families who had taken time off work, carefully prepared questions, and expected to receive structured logistical plans for re-entry along with details on overall support. “We’d rearranged our lives and cleared our schedules, hoping to get concrete answers,” said one resident. “But with the meeting suddenly off the table, it felt like we were back at square one.”

Jim Vallance pictured with Denise Hamilton, the mother of a homeowner, as they support each other while retrieving belongings on the same day.

Wilson Chowdhry Pushes for Rescheduled Access

In response, Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, pressed the council to reschedule the meeting and expedite decisions for re-entry, stressing the mounting emotional strain on homeowners. “People were desperate to collect their things and wanted a clearer understanding at where things were heading so tey could  begin rebuilding some normalcy, but these cancellations and delays made the situation feel endless,” Chowdhry said. He emphasized the urgent need to confirm the feasibility of re-entries, especially for residents still facing mortgage, rent, and utility payments on vacated properties.

After weeks of communication and advocacy, a rescheduled meeting finally took place on 20th October, where Chowdhry, and Wells, discussed logistics for the item retrieval process. The meeting, though positive, was a disappointment for residents as the council underscored the safety challenges of accessing the RAAC-affected buildings. It was ultimately decided that residents would need to view their belongings remotely, through a video link to avoid structural risks. Although residents had hoped for more direct access, they agreed, recognizing there was no other option open to them. However, they requested larger viewing screens for ease – a request that was unfortunately met with only a mobile phone link due to logistical constraints.

An AMC Removal van, prepared and ready for packing and loading.

Challenging Scheduling for Re-Entry

Scheduling re-entry dates also proved challenging, with families trying to coordinate around work and personal commitments. Homeowners like Lynsey Maquater faced particular difficulties; her original re-entry was planned for 5th November, but personal obligations required a new date, which the council was able to adjust to 31st October. These logistical hurdles added strain to what was already an emotionally charged process.

The re-entry schedule unfolded as follows:

• 30th October – 81 Chapelle Crescent
• 31st October – High Street and Park Street Residents (excluding resident of 39 High Street)
• 6th & 7th November – Resident of 39 High Street, given the extensive material requiring clearance.

Jim and Fiona squinted intently at the small phone screen, trying to make out details of their flat during the video link viewing.

Process and Challenges: The re-entry process, coordinated by Clackmannanshire Council and AMC Removals, required careful planning due to structural safety concerns. Residents were not permitted to physically enter the properties themselves; instead, they viewed the removal of items via a video link in a protective cabin. Although a larger screen was requested, residents had to make do with a mobile phone view, which further complicated an already challenging experience.

The council’s chosen contractor, AMC Removals, coordinated a detailed removal process involving multiple vehicles, staff, and council officials. Homeowners, though unable to enter their properties directly, viewed the retrieval of items from a protective cabin, monitoring the process via video feed. For some residents, the experience brought both relief and sorrow. There were also two council officers who were praised for their sensitivity and support, easing the difficult process for residents. “The staff were incredibly patient and flexible, which really helped reduce the anxiety everyone was feeling,” said Hamilton.

Jim signing an authority and liability waiver to allow the removal of his belongings to proceed.

Emotional Experiences During the Re-Entry Process:

• Denise Hamilton described a poignant moment as she sat in a small mobile cabin outside her former home. “I was okay until I sat down in the little hut and got a wee bit emotional speaking to [council officer] Kim about the situation everybody is in,” she shared. Hamilton was able to retrieve several items for her daughter Emma, including two wall heaters and a wall-mounted hall table. While grateful to see the property “in pretty good condition,” Hamilton added, “It’s just a little step forward, and there’s still a long way to go.”

• Gary Morrison struggled with the state of his property on the top floor, which had accumulated significant damage due to inspections. “There was significant damage and debris... we couldn’t take the fridge/freezer due to mould, fungus, and insects,” Morrison noted. Although his refrigerator was beyond saving, Morrison appreciated the council’s efforts: “Kim was considerate and helpful, and the contractors did all the heavy lifting to move the washing machine to my garage. On the day, the staff could not have been better.”

• Fiona Vallance and her husband, Jimmy, felt both relief and sorrow upon re-entering their property. “We felt a bit emotional seeing inside the flat,” she said. “The council and contractors were very kind and considerate. Kim was lovely, caring, and respectful while listening to us. We managed to get our radiators out, which we were pleased about.” However, the sight of the extensive damage, particularly holes in the ceiling, cast a shadow on the day. “We hope this will be finalised soon and let us continue with a normal life.”

• Frances Reid echoed similar sentiments, feeling surprised and thankful for the condition of her items. “Guys, can I just say I was pleasantly surprised with the condition of the items after being boarded up all this time,” she said. “I got my leather sofa, beds, and mattresses into a van. I told them not to lift them if they were mouldy or damp, and they were okay. It was emotional – yes, sad – absolutely, but unfortunately, it’s another step we have to take.” Reid also extended her support to fellow homeowners, adding, “I’m here for anyone that needs me.”

• Fiona Crichton was disappointed by the condition of some of her items. “I picked up the washer/dryer from Park St today and drove it to Edinburgh, but it doesn’t work. So it was a complete waste of time,” she shared. The sight of her flat’s condition was distressing, with furniture “thrown to the side by the workmen to get into the roof.” She added, “My flat is on the top floor, and seeing it in that state was difficult.”

• Lynsey Maquater faced her own challenges during the process, struggling with logistics to retrieve her belongings. Although the council accommodated her need for a different entry date, a deeply personal item, a watch that once belonged to her father, could not be found. While there were no allegations of theft, the situation was upsetting for her and highlighted the emotional weight of the experience.

Looking Forward: Wilson Chowdhry Calls for Continued Support and Transparency from Clackmannanshire Council

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, stressed the importance of sustained support and transparency from Clackmannanshire Council as the RAAC crisis continues to affect homeowners. “While the re-entry process has provided some much-needed relief, it is crucial that the council remains proactive in addressing the broader concerns these families face,” Chowdhry stated. “The ongoing impact of RAAC on these residents cannot be overstated. The emotional and financial strain they’ve endured, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding the future of their properties, means that immediate action is necessary. We continue to urge the council to expedite fair property valuations and offer compensation to ease the significant burdens on displaced homeowners.”

Chowdhry further emphasized that these families, who have faced an abrupt and often disheartening process, are now pushing for the council to be accountable and transparent in their future decisions. “It's vital that homeowners can trust the process moving forward and know that their concerns are being addressed swiftly and fairly,” he added.

In response to the ongoing challenges, homeowners have announced a protest on 8th November, from 11am to 12pm outside Kilncraigs, Greenside Street, Alloa, FK10 1EB, ahead of a scheduled meeting with Kevin Wells, Strategic Director of Place, set to begin at 12pm. Homeowners are inviting others to join them in standing up for the fair treatment and support they desperately need.

Furthermore, homeowners are planning another protest on 13th November, from 9:30am to 10:30am outside the Scottish Parliament, to coincide with the consideration of a petition being heard by the Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee. The petition calls for a national budget to assist RAAC homeowners, a public inquiry into the handling of the RAAC situation by councils, and legislative changes to prevent similar crises in the future. The UK RAAC petition is scheduled to be discussed around 10:50am, and homeowners are inviting all supporters to attend and show their solidarity.

“The fight is far from over,” Chowdhry concluded. “This is about securing the future of these homeowners and ensuring that no one else has to go through what they have. We need everyone’s voice in this movement to ensure that justice is served, and these families are treated with the fairness and respect they deserve.”

Edward Mountain MSP Backs RAAC Homeowners’ Petition as Campaigners Push for £3.4bn Fund Allocation Ahead of Scottish Parliament Consideration and Protest on 13th November

IMAGE: Protestors from the UK RAAC Campaign Group were joined by Sir Edward Mountain MSP, who advocated for them by writing to Scottish Housing Minister Paul McLelland.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, alongside his daughter Hannah, has registered an online petition on the Scottish Parliament petition portal, which will be considered by the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee during its meeting on 13 November 2024 at Holyrood.  The approximate time for the consideration will be 10.50am.

Members of the public can watch the meeting live via Parliament TV or attend in person by booking tickets through the Parliament's website, available one week prior to the meeting.

On 22 August, a response to the petition was submitted by the Building Standards Division of the Scottish Government, detailing current actions regarding Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) affected properties. This response highlights that the Scottish Housing Regulator is actively working with registered social landlords (RSLs) to manage approximately 1,994 homes affected by RAAC. While the UK Government has not allocated national funding for RAAC repairs, local authorities are encouraged to support residents through their Scheme of Assistance Strategies. The government does not see a need for a Public Inquiry due to existing knowledge about RAAC and ongoing collaboration through the RAAC Cross Sector Working Group. Additionally, it was noted that changes to building legislation would be under the UK Parliament’s jurisdiction, and while Scotland’s Building Standards Act provides enforcement powers, a register of high-risk buildings is not planned due to resource constraints.

In response, Mr. Chowdhry submitted further commentary on 6 October, emphasizing the historical oversight failures surrounding RAAC, which have been known since the 1960s. His response criticizes the lack of comprehensive investigations by safety bodies and calls for the establishment of a national fund to assist homeowners with remediation and fair property valuations. Furthermore, he urges a public inquiry to ensure transparency in council demolition plans and equitable treatment for socio-economically disadvantaged communities. Updating legislation to include a high-risk building registry and detailed property reports is deemed essential to prevent future crises.

Despite reaching out to all MSPs for Clackmannanshire and Aberdeen for support, Mr. Chowdhry has received no written responses from them. However, he received encouragement from Highlands and Islands MSP Edward Mountain, who actively engaged with over 50 homeowners during their protest at the Scottish Parliament on 2 September 2024 (click here). Edward Mountain’s office has confirmed that he has submitted a letter of support for the petition.

Wilson Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign, said: "Scottish MSPs rarely offer public support for petitions, so we are genuinely moved by Edward Mountain MSP’s empathy," said Wilson Chowdhry. "Even with few RAAC-affected homeowners in his region, he has stepped up to support us. MSP Liam Kerr has also expressed interest in the petition and is receiving updates from the petition committee. I hope more MSPs with affected constituents will follow their lead."

Additionally, Mr. Chowdhry submitted another written response today (click here), urging the Scottish Parliament to allocate a portion of the new £3.4 billion in Treasury funding—announced by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves—to support homeowners affected by RAAC facing significant financial and safety challenges. This additional funding, which Reeves described as the largest real-terms settlement since devolution, stems from the UK Government's budget and presents a vital opportunity for addressing urgent needs.

The proposed funding could facilitate critical remediation efforts, prevent local councils from acquiring properties at undervalued prices, and ensure that homeowner rights under the Equality Act 2010 are upheld. Furthermore, the proposal advocates for updating Blight Notice procedures to guarantee that councils purchase affected properties at fair market value, thereby safeguarding families from further economic distress.

Homeowners are organizing a protest outside the Scottish Parliament on 13 November from 12 PM to 2 PM ahead of the committee meeting from 9.30am to 10.30am, aiming to influence the Committee’s decisions positively.  Evacuated homeowners from Tillicoultry, along with RAAC-affected residents from Dundee and Deans South, have already confirmed attendance but other affected RAAc regions are expected to join.

Options available to the Committee for action on the petition may include:

• Requesting additional written information or testimonies from the Scottish Government or other organizations.
• Inviting the petitioner for further discussion about the petition.
• Referring the petition to another committee.
• Recommending actions for the Scottish Government.
• Calling for a debate on the petition in the Chamber.
• Closing the petition.

“It’s imperative that MSPs on the Petitions Committee fully grasp the devastating impact the RAAC Homes scandal is having on homeowners across Scotland,” said Wilson Chowdhry. “Many affected individuals are facing severe mental health struggles, some experiencing deep depression and expressing suicidal thoughts, as they face the prospect of losing their homes. They stand to be compensated so little that they risk effective bankruptcy, while councils—backed by an apathetic government—seize the chance to buy up these properties cheaply to develop more lucrative projects. This looming decision is a final thread of hope for thousands of homeowners who fear their entire livelihoods will be stripped away unless the Scottish Government establishes a national fund to protect them.”

Questions Raised Over Aberdeen City Council’s Handling of RAAC-Affected Properties: Delays, Lack of Transparency, and Blight Notice Eligibility

IMAGE: Wilson Chowdhry leads a delegation to 10 Downing Street, delivering a letter and petition to Keir Starmer and Housing Minister Angela Rayner, requesting UK government assistance for the RAAC homes scandal. As of now, they have received no response.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

The UK RAAC Campaign Group has raised serious concerns about Aberdeen City Council’s lack of transparency, prolonged delays, and potential legal issues concerning the acquisition of RAAC-affected properties in the Balnagask estate. With Council responses frequently delayed or left incomplete, homeowners are left facing an uncertain future and limited options as the Council fails to provide crucial details around the proposed voluntary acquisition, valuation process, and intended demolition of the estate.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chair of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, has been engaging with the Council since August to obtain clear answers on key questions. Despite Aberdeen City Council representative Stephen Booth’s assurances, responses remain delayed, and essential details continue to be withheld. 

Council Responses Raise Alarming Concerns

In a response dated 8th October, Stephen Booth informed Mr. Chowdhry that the Council had only recently decided to proceed with voluntary acquisitions, explaining that “the decision on the council offering to buy back properties was only made at the recent meeting of full council [August 18th].” However, Mr. Chowdhry’s question regarding how the Council intends to deduct roof repair costs from the “current market value” remains unanswered in practical terms. There is no clear rationale provided for why RAAC-affected homes, which the Council itself built and sold without declaring the use of RAAC as a known unsafe building material, should be valued with such deductions. Mr. Booth’s statement that these deductions reflect “one way to arrive at the current Market Value” raises significant concerns among homeowners, who fear their properties are being unjustly undervalued.

Recently, over 70 homeowners in Aberdeen have united in a decision to withhold cooperation from Aberdeen City Council. The majority have agreed not to engage in the voluntary acquisition process until the Council provides written confirmation that the cost of repairing the RAAC panels will not be deducted from the valuation of their homes. Mr. Chowdhry discussed this issue on That's TV, highlighting the community's concerns and call for transparency.

Additionally, Mr. Chowdhry had requested a breakdown of the types of properties involved—such as one-bedroom, two-bedroom, or larger homes—yet this information remains unavailable. Despite a promise on September 17th that this breakdown would be provided within “the next few days,” residents have yet to receive any information, further fueling distrust in the Council’s engagement process.

Legal Validity of Demolition and Development Decision Questioned

Adding to residents’ anxiety, Mr. Chowdhry has requested confirmation on the legality and validity of the Council’s decision to demolish and redevelop the Balnagask estate without fully secured funding. Mr. Booth indicated that while funding has been identified for initial phases, “officers have been asked to look at a variety of ways to have the site redeveloped for housing,” with no guarantee that additional resources will be available. According to Mr. Chowdhry, this raises concerns about the Council’s accountability and whether the decision to proceed with the demolition and redevelopment is legally sound.

Mr. Chowdhry commented on the apparent legal ambiguity surrounding the Council’s decision:

“The decision to approve demolition and redevelopment of the Balnagask estate without secured funding seems neither legal nor valid to me. The 'best value' approach adopted by Aberdeen City Council appears to avoid paying a fair price to homeowners, driven by budget constraints. Moreover, the proposal to demolish and rebuild, despite the lack of funds for construction, seems like a strategic move to evade the same failures faced by West Lothian Council, who lost their Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) in 2010 due to serious shortcomings, namely (1) the absence of a formal or approved redevelopment scheme for the Order land and (2) a lack of planning permission, apart from that for the redevelopment of 190 and 192 Deans South.”

A Blight Notice as a Potential Path Forward for Homeowners

Given these prolonged delays, incomplete responses, and lack of transparency, Mr. Chowdhry has requested clarification on whether affected homeowners may be eligible to apply for a Blight Notice under the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. Should the Council initiate a Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO), a Blight Notice could allow residents an opportunity to petition for early acquisition of their properties, offering some relief amid ongoing devaluation and lack of clear information on redevelopment plans.

Council’s Responsibility to Provide Answers and Accountability

The UK RAAC Campaign Group has sent an email today strongly urging Aberdeen City Council to expedite its response process and provide transparent information on the valuation and acquisition of RAAC-affected homes. Furthermore, the Council is called upon to clarify the legal and financial grounds underpinning its demolition and redevelopment plans, which have already left residents deeply concerned.

Wilson Chowdhry continued:

“These unanswered questions and persistent delays are causing further distress to residents who have already endured enough due to their RAAC-affected homes. Aberdeen City Council must uphold its responsibility to these residents by providing clear, timely answers and ensuring any redevelopment plan is legally and financially viable from the outset.”

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of UK RAAC Campaign Group, Lays Out Key Demands from Displaced Homeowners to Kevin Wells, Clackmannanshire's Strategic Director: Place

Wilson Chowdhry shares homeowner grievances with Clackmannanshire Council's, Kevin Wells Strategic Officer - Place

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

On a recent MS Teams meeting, Kevin Wells (KW), representing Clackmannanshire Council, met with Wilson Chowdhry (WC) and affected residents to discuss RAAC-related concerns. The meeting addressed key issues impacting displaced homeowners, including potential property valuations, housing alternatives, and delayed re-entries into homes. Below is a summary of the key points discussed.

1. Pre-RAAC Property Valuations

WC raised the possibility of considering pre-RAAC valuations for affected properties, as the current RAAC situation has severely diminished their market value. KW acknowledged the challenge, stating that any such decision would need approval from elected council members. While difficult to determine pre-RAAC valuations, KW expressed that he would provide as much information as possible to support this consideration. WC suggested that properties sold just prior to the RAAC declaration could offer a basis for valuation, to which KW responded that, although feasible, public funds and proper justification must be considered.

2. Council Obligations and Financial Considerations

WC emphasized that the council has a responsibility under Section 71 of the Housing Act to support homeowners, many of whom face potential homelessness without compensation based on pre-RAAC values. KW reassured attendees that the council's legal obligation will be taken into account, though financial constraints and the broader impact on public funds remain central concerns. While KW was non-committal, he expressed a desire to do everything possible for affected tenants.

3. Resident Participation and Future Communication

WC requested access to the Council's options report before it is submitted, offering to provide a statement to be included in the paper. KW agreed to discuss the paper before submission but could not guarantee WC's statement would be included. KW did, however, express a willingness to maintain open lines of communication, promising to arrange future meetings with WC to ensure resident voices are heard.

4. Timeline for Responses and Re-Entry to Properties

KW committed to responding to the points raised within 10 working days. Regarding property re-entry, KW indicated that re-entry for residents would not be possible due to the dangerous condition of the buildings. However, third-party access under strict safety protocols could be facilitated, with a confirmed date to follow.

5. Milestones and Next Steps

The meeting concluded with KW agreeing to arrange a future meeting to review the council's paper on RAAC-affected properties. He promised to provide updates on the re-entry process and discuss further resident concerns in the coming weeks.

---

Key Resident Concerns Submitted for Clackmannanshire Council's Response:

1. Public Participation in Council Meetings: Homeowners seek clarity on how they can participate in the Full Council Meeting discussing the RAAC options report.

2. Council's Position as Majority Owners: There is concern about the Council’s potential vote as the majority owner, particularly if it differs from the preferences of private homeowners.

3. Petition Rejection and Lack of Response: Homeowners still await a response to a previously rejected petition regarding RAAC and further submissions.

4. Property Valuations: Homeowners seek confirmation if the Council is still considering both current and pre-RAAC market valuations.

5. Accompanied Re-Entry Delays: The extended delay in re-entry has worsened property conditions, increasing concerns over theft and decay.

6. Alternative Housing Options: Homeowners are asking for a wider range of housing options to accommodate displaced families.

7. Compensation for Cancelled Meetings: Many incurred costs due to the sudden cancellation of a previous meeting, and seek compensation.

8. Financial Relief: Homeowners facing mortgage payments alongside rent and insurance costs request financial relief or assistance under a voluntary agreement scheme.

9. Scottish Government Support: Has the Council requested Scottish Government funding for necessary remedial works or compensation for pre-RAAC valuations?

10. Remedial Works Quotation: Residents want assurance that qualified contractors are being consulted for potential remedial work, alongside cost estimates for safety-compliant solutions.

In a positive development following the previously cancelled meeting, Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, has announced a key milestone for RAAC-affected homeowners. Mr. Chowdhry shared, "Progress has finally been made, and a crucial meeting with all homeowners has now been scheduled for11am on  8th November. Council Chambers, Kilncraig. This meeting represents a significant step forward after months of delays and uncertainties, and it will allow us to collectively address our ongoing concerns."

Additionally, in a positive outcome from recent discussions, dates have been confirmed for residents to re-enter their properties and retrieve valuables and sentimental items left behind. The re-entry schedule is as follows:

• 30th October – 81 Chapelle Crescent
• 31st October – High Street and Park Street residents (excluding 39 High Street)
• 6th & 7th November – Resident of 39 High Street (due to the extensive materials needing clearance)

Mr. Chowdhry emphasized the importance of these re-entries, stating, "This allows homeowners to recover items that hold both financial and emotional value, helping ease the burden they've been under since evacuation."

Residents will be contacted by officers to confirm their participation, and all re-entries will be conducted with council oversight and resident consent.

Dundee Residents Voice Concerns Over RAAC Roof Panels Amid Mortgage Crisis

 

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Dundee Residents Voice Concerns Over RAAC Roof Panels Amid Mortgage Crisis

Dundee, Scotland – 15.10.24 – Residents of a block of flats in Dundee are raising urgent concerns following the discovery of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) panels in their roofs, prompting a mortgage crisis that is leaving them with potentially unsellable properties.

In May, Dundee City Council issued letters urging residents to inspect their roofs for Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) panels, a material known for its structural vulnerabilities. While the council covered the costs of inspections for properties with their own tenants, no such support was extended to blocks comprised entirely of private homeowners. A subsequent report from a structural engineer confirmed the presence of RAAC panels in one block of six flats. Although the engineer recommended reinforcing the roof with heavier timbers to mitigate risks and potentially restore property values, banks remain hesitant to issue mortgages on properties containing RAAC. This has effectively trapped homeowners, leaving them unable to sell or move. Furthermore, the lack of legislation to protect homeowners in these circumstances has enabled banks to profit from the crisis, worsening the situation for those who have become mortgage prisoners.

Local media reported that up to 800 properties in Dundee may contain RAAC, with the Council offering to cover inspection costs for tenants but refusing responsibility for privately owned homes. This lack of support has left residents like Wayne Hoskins in a precarious situation.

“My neighbor lost a sale when potential buyers withdrew their offer due to mortgage difficulties,” Hoskins said. “He eventually sold his property for nearly £30,000 less than the asking price. We are now facing the same struggle, trying to sell at auction and likely incurring a significant loss.”

Despite reaching out to the Council and local councillors for assistance, residents have received no response, leaving them in the dark about the potential risks posed by their roofs. Concerns about the structural integrity of RAAC panels are heightened by the lack of communication from officials.

“I used to live in a similar flat in the late 90s when the Council replaced the felt roofs, yet here we are again, over 30 years later, facing another crisis,” Hoskins added. “We feel abandoned and anxious about the safety of our homes.”

Residents are demanding clarity from Dundee City Council on the status of their properties, including how long the roofs may remain safe and whether they will be subject to eviction orders similar to those seen in Aberdeen.

Wilson Chowdhry, a community advocate leading a campaign for more transparency from Dundee City Council, emphasized the urgent need for action. “Our initial demands include greater clarity on the position of homeowners, more dialogue with affected residents, and fiscal assistance for families grappling with the consequences of poorly constructed buildings,” Chowdhry stated. “It’s unacceptable for residents to bear the burden of a problem that stems from council decisions made years ago.”

Residents are calling for:

1. Immediate communication from Dundee City Council regarding the status of RAAC panels and the risks associated.
2. Financial support for inspections and necessary structural reinforcements.
3. A clear plan for addressing the impact of RAAC on property values and mortgage availability.

As the situation unfolds, the residents of Dundee await answers and hope for swift action to protect their homes and investments.

RAAC Homeowners Devastated by Aberdeen Principal Valuer’s Decision to Reject Council Tax Appeal

Hannah and Wilson Chowdhry deliver a deputation to Aberdeen City Council

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

Aberdeen, 11 October 2024 – Homeowners impacted by Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) have expressed deep distress after Bruce Simpson, Principal Valuer for Aberdeen, dismissed their appeal to reduce Council Tax. Despite the dangerous state of RAAC-affected homes, the decision maintains that the homes are still taxable as though they are in a "reasonable state of repair," despite plans for demolition announced by Aberdeen City Council in August 2024.

Hannah Chowdhry, a RAAC homeowner, expressed her frustration:

"This ruling is incomprehensible. We’re living in homes that are unsafe, with no chance of selling them, yet we are being taxed as if they're in perfect condition. RAAC is not a cosmetic issue—it’s a crisis, and yet the financial pressure continues to mount. This decision ignores the harsh reality that we're facing."

In the August Council meeting, Aberdeen City Council declared that the cost to repair RAAC homes exceeds the value of the properties, and thus, they will be demolished. Despite this, the Principal Valuer has ruled that the structural damage caused by RAAC is considered "repairable," using outdated legal precedents to justify the refusal to reassess Council Tax.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, voiced his outrage:

"This was a golden opportunity to set a precedent that would alleviate the financial burden on families dealing with a national crisis. Instead, this decision perpetuates the injustice. The council admits these homes are going to be demolished, yet they expect homeowners to continue paying Council Tax as if these homes are livable. It’s absolutely absurd."

He continued:

"This is not just about RAAC—this is about fairness. Families are being crushed under the weight of mortgage payments, Council Tax, and now rent elsewhere because they cannot live in these homes. And yet, the Principal Valuer dismisses the RAAC issue as though it can be fixed with a few repairs. These homes are collapsing, and this decision only deepens the financial and emotional stress."

The RAAC crisis has left homeowners in a state of limbo, with properties that are structurally unsound and rapidly losing value. Many families are struggling to manage the dual burden of paying Council Tax and rent, while receiving no clarity on compensation or timelines for demolition.

Hannah Chowdhry pointed out the inconsistencies:

"Our home is unsellable, and we’ve had to reach out to multiple agents just to get a valuation, but no one will touch it because of the RAAC. Yet we’re still being taxed as if it’s a viable, functional property. This decision is completely out of touch with reality."

At the August Full Council meeting, Aberdeen City Council’s Corporate Landlord, Mr. Booth, acknowledged that any valuations would be below pre-RAAC values, and market comparisons were impossible due to the lack of similar properties on the market. Despite these concessions, the Principal Valuer's ruling has refused to consider the real impact RAAC is having on affected homes.

Wilson Chowdhry stressed the need for immediate action:

"This isn’t just about a few homes—this is a national issue affecting thousands of families. Continuing to charge Council Tax on homes that the council admits will be demolished is an insult to homeowners who are already financially drained. This decision needs to be reconsidered, and the council should be working with RAAC homeowners, not against them."

The UK RAAC Campaign Group is taking further legal action and urging homeowners across the country to stand together to challenge unfair tax assessments. An appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal for Scotland has been submitted, with hopes to overturn this ruling and set a fairer precedent for homeowners facing similar issues.

---

About the UK RAAC Campaign Group
The UK RAAC Campaign Group, led by Chairman Wilson Chowdhry, advocates for homeowners affected by Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC). The group fights for fair treatment, financial relief, and long-term solutions for families whose homes have been rendered unsafe by RAAC structural issues.

You can read the seven key points that form the basis of our appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal (click here)

You can read the response from Brian Simms the Principal Valuer for Aberdeen (here)

RAAC Crisis: Latest Response to Scottish Parliament Petitions Committee Calls for Immediate Action, Financial Support, and Legislative Reforms

IMAGE:  UK RAAC Campaign Group Protestors were joined by Sir Edward Mountain MSP who later wrote to the Housing Minister Paul McLelland on their behalf.

PLEASE JOIN OUR 'UK RAAC CAMPAIGN GROUP' FB PAGE (HERE)

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITIONS FOR UK GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE) and OFFICIAL SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (CLICK HERE)

WATCH FIRST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEATURE ON RAAC HOUSING CRISES (HERE)

The Ongoing RAAC Crisis

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, and his daughter Hannah Chowdhry, a prominent advocate for RAAC-affected homeowners, have submitted a detailed response to the Scottish Government (click here). Together, they call for immediate action to address the significant safety concerns and systemic failures surrounding the use of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in Scotland’s housing infrastructure. The submission responds to the government’s current stance on RAAC and initial response to their on-line petition (click here), urging more comprehensive solutions to this housing crisis that has plunged many homeowners into disarray and financial uncertainty.

Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry’s submission highlights past RAAC-related disasters, including the 1990s collapse of homes in Basildon, where over 800 properties were demolished, and the 2004 demolition of 84 homes in Deans South, Scotland, due to structural defects linked to RAAC. These events, alongside the planned demolitions of RAAC homes in Tillicoultry and Torry, underscore a longstanding failure by both local councils and the government to act.  

Further evidence of these failures can be traced back to a doctor's surgery on the Basildon Knights Estate, which was forced to relocate in 2019 due to severe structural issues, including cracked walls and sinking floors. Despite these warning signs, local authorities and the UK Government once again failed to respond promptly and did not extend their investigations to nearby homes (click here).

"RAAC is a material with an alarming history of failure," said Wilson Chowdhry. "The fact that the Scottish Government still hesitates to address its dangers shows a failure of oversight that spans decades. Large-scale demolitions like those in Basildon and Deans South should have spurred action, but they didn’t. Now, Scottish homeowners are paying the price for this negligence."

Historical Failures Ignored

The Chowdhrys challenge the lack of a thorough investigation into RAAC by bodies such as the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and the Standing Committee on Structural Safety (SCOSS). Despite the alarming number of structural failures and demolitions, no formal inquiry into RAAC’s long-term safety was launched, allowing this defective material to proliferate unchecked across Scottish housing.

"If councils had acted sooner, we wouldn’t be facing this crisis today," said Hannah Chowdhry. "RAAC homes continued to be built and renovated long after it was clear the material was a risk. In many cases, councils ignored residents’ complaints about leaks and structural concerns for years before roofs literally started caving in."

Systemic Failures in Maintenance and Financial Support

The petitioners are particularly critical of the lack of financial support for homeowners, who are now facing enormous costs to repair or even retain their properties. While the Scottish Government's Scheme of Assistance Strategy offers advice and guidance, it provides no tangible financial relief.

"Homeowners are stuck between a rock and a hard place," said Wilson Chowdhry. "They’re expected to fix these homes themselves, without any grants, loans, or support schemes. People are on the brink of losing their homes, and the government is offering nothing but empty advice."

Clackmannanshire Council comes under particular scrutiny for its handling of the crisis. The council, according to the Chowdhrys, has pushed ahead with demolition plans without even exploring options for remediation. The petitioners accuse the council of using its majority ownership of affected properties to bulldoze through demolition plans, ignoring the homeowners who wish to keep their homes.

"These councils see RAAC as a way to justify cheap redevelopment," said Hannah Chowdhry. "They’re not giving homeowners a fair chance to retain their properties. Instead, they’re delaying everything—reports, decisions—so they can buy homes at reduced prices and redevelop the land for profit."

Call for Immediate Financial Support and a National Fund

The submission calls for the creation of a National Fund to support homeowners impacted by RAAC. Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry propose reallocating a portion of the £3.5 billion affordable housing fund or utilizing the unused £97.1 million earmarked for cladding remediation.

"A National Fund is the only fair solution for homeowners," Wilson Chowdhry emphasized. "People shouldn’t be forced into financial ruin because the councils and government ignored this issue for decades."

The petitioners also express frustration with the six-month wait for council option reports, which are already outdated by the time they are issued. The delay affects market valuations and further disadvantages homeowners, leading to fears that councils are intentionally dragging their feet to offer below-market prices for properties.

Demand for Public Inquiry and Legislative Reforms

In their submission, Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry demand a public inquiry into the historical failings of councils and the Scottish Government regarding RAAC. They question why, in the early 2000s, several councils chose to install secondary roofs over RAAC structures without addressing the core safety issues.

"Adding new roofs over RAAC buildings wasn’t a solution—it was a cover-up," said Wilson Chowdhry. "These councils didn’t want to spend the money to fix the real problems, and now homeowners are paying for that short-term thinking."

Clackmannanshire Council is specifically criticized for its failure to address years of water ingress and poor maintenance, which hastened the deterioration of RAAC homes. Aberdeen City Council also faces accusations of offering below-market valuations for homes, citing the “best value solution” under the Local Government Act of 2003—a move that petitioners argue ignores the broader socio-economic consequences for vulnerable homeowners.

Key Recommendations for the Scottish Government Petitions Committee

The UK RAAC Campaign Group, led by Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry, has urged the Scottish Government’s Petitions Committee to act decisively by:

1. Requesting further information from the Scottish Government and councils about their RAAC management practices.
2. Inviting petitioners to present their case in person before the Committee, ensuring direct insights from affected homeowners.
3. Referring the petition to other parliamentary committees, particularly those overseeing housing and building safety.
4. Recommending the establishment of a National Fund for financial relief and RAAC remediation.
5. Pushing for a full debate in the Scottish Parliament, forcing ministers to address the issue publicly and develop actionable solutions.
6. Launching a public inquiry into the councils and authorities that failed to take earlier action on RAAC safety.

The Chowdhry family, through their ongoing petition to the Scottish Parliament, have been calling on local authorities to fully utilize the provisions under Section 71 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. This legislation allows local councils to provide financial assistance to homeowners in distress. In their petition, they highlighted guidance received from the Housing Minister, which points to Section 71 as a key mechanism for addressing the crisis. However, councils, including Clackmannanshire and Aberdeen, have so far failed to make full use of these provisions, exacerbating the housing challenges faced by many affected residents, particularly the elderly.

Delays in Response: Two Key Points That Stalled Progress

Progress in finalizing the petition submission was delayed as two critical points were negotiated between the petitioners and the committee:

1. Clarification on Development Plans: Wilson Chowdhry raised concerns that Clackmannanshire Council officers had downplayed the formal status of development plans relating to RAAC properties. Documents obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request revealed that these plans, endorsed with the council's official logo, were more than informal proposals—they held official status. Although some council officials presented a different narrative, the Chowdhrys insisted on retaining this crucial detail. In the interest of moving forward, however, Wilson Chowdhry agreed to accept the committee’s latest amendment on this point, allowing the submission process to proceed.

2. Reference to Housing Minister’s Guidance: Another point of contention involved the explicit mention of the Housing Minister’s guidance on Section 71. Wilson Chowdhry stressed that the letter his daughter Hannah received from the Minister provided clear direction to use Section 71 provisions. This was not a disputable issue, and its inclusion was vital to the petitioners’ argument that councils had the power, but were choosing not to act in the best interests of affected homeowners. After careful review, the committee agreed to maintain this critical reference, ensuring that the petition fully reflects the Housing Minister’s advice.

Resolution and Next Steps

After the detailed negotiations, Wilson Chowdhry has now agreed to the latest amendments proposed by the committee. This agreement means the Petitioner written submission of 6 October 2024 can move forward without further delay, allowing it to be published and considered by the relevant authorities.

“We are relieved to have finally reached an agreement that retains the key elements of our argument. While it has been frustrating to face delays, we are confident that the amended submission will enable the Scottish Parliament Petition Committee to effectively urge the government to recognize the urgency of the situation. We hope this will lead to decisive action, pushing councils to use the powers available to them and securing necessary funding support from the government to help affected homeowners,” said Wilson Chowdhry.

The petitioners continue to call for stronger action from both Scottish Councils and the Scottish Government, urging them to provide financial support and practical solutions to address the housing crisis worsened by RAAC. Mr. Chowdhry is set to meet with Kevin Wells, Strategic Director: Place at Clackmannanshire Council, on 17th October 2024 to review the RAAC issues affecting homeowners in Tillicoultry. He also has a scheduled meeting on 14th October with Basildon Council Leader Cllr. Gavin Callaghan, Chief Executive Kim Bromley-Derry, and Assistant Director of Property, Asset Management & Development Jonathan Tizzard, as he pushes for a fair deal for Basildon residents facing similar challenges in England.

A Call for Legislative Changes

Beyond financial relief, Wilson and Hannah Chowdhry call for legislative reforms, including updates to the Scottish Home Buyers Report process to clearly identify construction materials and safety risks. They also propose the creation of a High-Risk Register, allowing surveyors and homeowners to access crucial safety information on construction materials.

"RAAC is just one part of the problem," said Hannah Chowdhry. "We need stronger laws and more transparency in the housing sector so that future homeowners aren’t caught off guard by hidden risks like this."

Furthermore, the petitioners are advocating for critical legislative changes that impact Scottish homeowners but fall under the remit of the UK Government. A letter outlining these requests was delivered in person to Housing Minister Angela Rayner and Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing Street in May, and a response is still awaited.

One of the proposed changes includes legislation similar to the General Product Safety Regulations (GPSR), which requires manufacturers to address safety defects for the lifetime of a vehicle. The petitioners are calling for this principle to be applied to the housing industry, ensuring that developers are held accountable for rectifying safety issues, such as cladding and RAAC, in homes they built, even after the properties have been sold. This measure would ensure that developers who profited from constructing these homes are responsible for necessary repairs during future crises involving such safety defects.

Additionally, they are advocating for an amendment to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to protect homeowners whose properties are condemned or demolished from the burden of continuing to pay their mortgages. This could include provisions such as mortgage interest relief or other financial protections, emphasizing that the UK Government has previously bailed out banks with taxpayer money, and thus should be willing to accept a smaller financial loss to support affected homeowners.

Finally, they are pushing for a legislative amendment to the Finance Act 2003. This change would renew first-time buyer status for homeowners whose properties have been impacted by RAAC or similar crises, ensuring that those forced to start over are not unfairly penalized in future property purchases. The petitioners are hoping that this amendment could be supported through a Private Member’s Bill or incorporated into broader financial legislation in the UK Parliament.

Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the UK RAAC Campaign Group, stated:

"We urgently alos need the UK Government to acknowledge the severity of this crisis and take real action. Developers must be held accountable for the safety of the homes they build, not just for a few years after construction but for the lifetime of the property. Moreover, homeowners affected by structural defects like RAAC should not be left with the burden of paying off mortgages on homes that are no longer safe to live in. It’s time for the Government to step up, protect these vulnerable homeowners, and ensure they aren’t left financially ruined."